Logosm.gif (1927 bytes)
navlinks.gif (4688 bytes)
Hruler04.gif (5511 bytes)

Back to DC Water and Sewer Authority main page

Nancy Wilson, DC resident
testimony before the City Council Committee on Public Works and the Environment on the DC Water and Sewer Authority and Its Lead Service Replacement Program
March 17, 2004




Dorothy Brizill
Bonnie Cain
Jim Dougherty
Gary Imhoff
Phil Mendelson
Mark David Richards
Sandra Seegars


DCWatch Archives
Council Period 12
Council Period 13
Council Period 14

Election 1998
Election 2000
Election 2002

Election 2004
Election 2006

Government and People
Anacostia Waterfront Corporation
Boards and Com
Campaign Finance
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Management Officer
City Council
Control Board
Corporation Counsel
DC Agenda
Elections and Ethics
Fire Department
FOI Officers
Inspector General
Housing and Community Dev.
Human Services
Mayor's Office
Mental Health
Motor Vehicles
Neighborhood Action
National Capital Revitalization Corp.
Planning and Econ. Dev.
Planning, Office of
Police Department
Property Management
Public Advocate
Public Libraries
Public Schools
Public Service Commission
Public Works
Regional Mobility Panel
Sports and Entertainment Com.
Taxi Commission
Telephone Directory
University of DC
Water and Sewer Administration
Youth Rehabilitation Services
Zoning Commission

Issues in DC Politics

Budget issues
DC Flag
DC General, PBC
Gun issues
Health issues
Housing initiatives
Mayor’s mansion
Public Benefit Corporation
Regional Mobility
Reservation 13
Tax Rev Comm
Term limits repeal
Voting rights, statehood
Williams’s Fundraising Scandals


Appleseed Center
Cardozo Shaw Neigh.Assoc.
Committee of 100
Fed of Citizens Assocs
League of Women Voters
Parents United
Shaw Coalition



What Is DCWatch?

themail archives

Testimony for the Committee on Public Works and the Environment
Given by Nancy Wilson, DC resident who lives on 1300th block of A Street SE (the first street
where lead-pipe replacement began on Capitol Hill)
March 17, 2004 

Thank you Chair and Committee members. In my oral testimony I plan to highlight issues that are outlined in a detailed petition that is currently being circulated in my community for signature. I am providing the committee a draft of this petition for your information. The petition is for full replacement of our lead service lines from the water meter to our houses.

Which brings me to our first issue: We believe that WASA has not provided full disclosure about what is their responsibility to replace and what is the definition of public space. It is our belief that WASA is responsible for the lines in public space. The definition of public space, according to the DC Tax and Revenue, Real Property Tax Administration, is all property up to 18 inches from the front door. WASA has only replaced the line up to the water meter, leaving the remaining line, which, for the most part is public space. It is our belief that WASA cannot arbitrarily change the definition of public space by declaring they have made a policy decision only replace the pipes to the water meter. Please let me be clear that for whatever lines are the homeowner's responsibility, we are more than willing to assume the cost. We are not trying to "get out of' paying for our part of the pipe replacement; however, we feel we have been misled by WASA about what is indeed our financial responsibility.

The second issue I'd like to raise is about the poor and what I consider irresponsible communication from WASA. Let me first say that we have still not received our results back from the first test kit WASA left us. Until we know our results, we are working off the assumption that we have similar results as our neighbor, who got over 300 ppb.

Going back to the communication issue, the petition goes into explicit detail of examples of the lack of direct communication from WASA. In fact, most of the information I received about the pipe replacement was from my neighbor, Satu Webb, who diligently called WASA officials directly, only to get more vague, conflicting information. The most egregious communication issue I'd like to highlight involved the time after our pipe replacement. WASA provided us with post-replacement test kits that completely failed to mention that we should not cook or drink tap water under any circumstances until we received the results of the water test. To my knowledge, we have not received the post-replacement results. We are still using bottled water for cooking, drinking and cleaning my son's cups. Having worked in public relations in the past, I believe that WASA should have a representative on hand at the site daily to answer questions from the public. I also believe that generic fact sheets about lead do not go far in answering specific questions people may have about their particular issues.

The last issue involves cost and economics and the waste of tax-payers dollars. Among the rumors floating out there is that WASA may be paying contractors to come back to replace the rest of the pipe at a later date. While, for our street, this is the only option we have for having full replacement, it makes no economic sense to pay contractors to go in twice to replace pipes. I ask that the committee look into this mismanagement of tax payer dollars for future removals. It is my understanding that it not only inefficient and a waste of money, but that going in twice could result in higher lead levels due to chemical reactions with copper and the actual jarring of the pipes due to construction.

For my street, the 1300 block of A street SE, we would like a written, clear statement from WASA about the timeline for finishing total replacement of the pipes. Hopefully these issues can be avoided at future removal sites; however, our street would like to know if we can start drinking our water and when will our pipes be fully replaced.

Thank you for your time.

Back to top of page

Send mail with questions or comments to webmaster@dcwatch.com
Web site copyright ©DCWatch (ISSN 1546-4296)