Recommended Reading
Dear Readers:
J. Wyndal Gordon is the lawyer for Hakim Sutton, Michael Brown’s
campaign treasurer, whom Brown has accused of stealing from his
campaign. Gordon has written a strongly worded defense of Sutton, and
attack on Brown, on Facebook,
http://tinyurl.com/8algkb3.
“Brown knows for a fact that no money has been stolen and has been less
than forthright with the public when it comes to concerns about his
campaign finance reports. Even though Brown must concede with the MPD
that ‘no suspect’ has been named nor ‘charges’ filed, the harm has
already been done. QUESTION: How could someone steal over one hundred
ten thousand dollars from an experienced incumbent politician over a
twelve month period and the incumbent not know anything about where the
money went or that it was even ‘allegedly’ missing? ANSWER: No one could
and No one has. Brown's theft allegations become even more absurd in
light of the fact that the campaign only raised $150k during that same
period of time. You mean to tell me that over two thirds of your
campaign treasury was depleted and you knew nothing about it?
Incredible.”
Washington Post editorial, “A Little Loose with Money,” builds on
Gordon’s article to comment on Brown’s finances and campaign,
http://tinyurl.com/8vy9oj9.
It recommends, “It is hard to divorce these latest issues from Mr.
Brown’s past failure to pay his rent, mortgage and taxes on time or his
previous campaign finance difficulties. An audit of his 2008 campaign
found unreported expenditures and checks returned because of
insufficient funds. In 1997 he pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor campaign
violation for making straw contributions. And now, as The Post’s Tim
Craig reports on Sunday’s front page [http://tinyurl.com/9vh6cth],
it turns out that Mr. Brown’s driving record is a mess: his driver’s
license has been suspended five times in the past eight years.
Incumbency and his family name (his father was the late commerce
secretary Ronald Brown) are seen as giving the edge to Mr. Brown. But
the field of challengers on November 6 includes several promising
candidates: Ms. Beatty, David Grosso and Leon J. Swain, Jr. Voters would
do well to consider the record before they vote for more of the same.”
Patrick Mara, “What Is DC Willing to Give to Get Local Budget
Autonomy?”
http://tinyurl.com/8f85sbq,
argues that DC should give u the idea of getting statehood, and focusing
on budget autonomy: “It’s time to face reality. The federal government
holds all the cards. D.C. Democrats need to start working with Capitol
Hill Republicans for the achievable end of budget autonomy. Both sides
must be willing to compromise a little. But the District probably needs
to give a little more. Also, the debate surely cannot be about
statehood. That is a pie in the sky. If overwhelming Democratic
political control of Congress and the White House didn’t produce
statehood for the District, surely it is not going to happen when power
is shared or when Republicans are in control. Republicans know full well
that any state of New Columbia would reliably elect two Democratic
senators long into the future.”
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
Howard U Opposes City’s McMillan Development
Plan
Kirby Vining,
restoremcmillan@gmail.com
Howard University has joined the fight against the city-sponsored
development plan for the McMillan Reservoir site at North Capitol Street
and Michigan Avenue, NW. The HU position is contained in a two-page
letter from Dr. Hassan Minor, senior vice president, to the District’s
Historic Preservation Review Board, which is currently considering
McMillan’s future. Dr. Minor states that “the current plan . . . falls
short” because it should be “more creative in its interpretation of [the
site’s] unique history [with] a much greater opportunity for the public
to enjoy its special above and below grade features.” He also points out
that McMillan is the “largest slow sand filtration plant in the country
built with the dual intentions of reducing the spread of infectious
typhoid fever and supplementing the park system of the Nation’s
Capital.”
Howard thus joins Council Chairman Phil Mendelson, Advisory
Neighborhood Commission 1B, and community groups representing
Bloomingdale, Pleasant Plains, and Stronghold in opposing the current
plan. Like Howard, Chairman Mendelson asks the HPRB to “reject the
master plan and design guidelines [because they would] demolish too much
of the site, including structural resources, landscape resources and
historic vistas.”
Councilmember Michael A. Brown will hold a community discussion on
the future of McMillan on Wednesday, September 19th, 10:00 a.m. in the
Wilson Building and the HPRB resumes its McMillan hearing on September
27, 441 4th Street NW, 2nd Floor. The McMillan Sand Filtration Site,
designated a DC Historic Landmark in 1991, runs north-south between
North Capitol Street and 1st Street and east-west between Michigan
Avenue and Channing Street, NW, in the District.
###############
Courtney Milloy’s Column About Speed Cameras
Tom Grahame,
tgrahame@mindspring.com
I agree with Mr. Milloy that if you are going to have speed cameras,
you need to correctly calibrate the right speed for the road. Missouri
Avenue, between N. Capitol and Georgia Avenue, is four lanes, several
blocks between stop lights, houses widely spaced. Everyone used to go
forty mph there, although the speed limit is twenty-five, the same speed
limit for much more crowded, narrow, two-lane streets on places like on
Capitol Hill. So several of us have gotten tickets for speeding on
Missouri Ave. If the speed limit were corrected to thirty-five mph, and
we went forty, there would be no problem, and everyone would be as safe
as before. The District would get less money, but it should get less
money; forty mph is safe there.
Another example is Western Avenue between Massachusetts Avenue and
River Road. Twenty-five is a bit slow; I can see thirty mph, but not
twenty-five -- again, it is four lanes, lots of space between stop signs
and stop lights. There are hills there, and even if you are trying to
keep to twenty-five, on the downhill you can get up to thirty-five and
take a speed camera shot very easily, as my wife has done, even when
trying to keep to twenty-five. Make the limit thirty; then we are OK
with the cameras.
I mostly drive these days; I don't bike any more, but I support speed
cameras where they genuinely are related to safety. Red light cameras in
dangerous intersections, or on streets where people really are driving
too fast for the conditions, for example. For the District to maintain
credibility, it needs to upgrade outdated speed limits."
###############
Speed Cameras and Safety, Part 1
James Treworgy,
jamietre@gmail.com
Regarding accident statistics for DC: Michael Overturf's response [themail,
September 12] presents interesting data, with deeply flawed conclusions.
First, the reason that DC has the lowest accident rates per VMT is
because DC residents drive, on average, much less than people who don't
live in cities. The average resident of any state that's not, in its
entirety, a city, will be much more likely to die in a car accident than
a resident of DC, because they drive more.If you compared DC against
another actual city, I doubt you'd find such excellence. The bottom line
is these statistics cannot be used to compare DC to another state; it's
apples and oranges.
Second, the numbers of traffic fatalities in DC are inadequate to
draw any conclusions. It's interesting that Mr. Overturf chose 2005 as
his starting point, because if you go back a bit farther, you can see
how meaningless these numbers are:
http://mpdc.dc.gov/mpdc/cwp/view,a,1240,q,548138,mpdcNav_GID,1552,mpdcNav,%7C.asp.
The first speed cameras were installed in DC in 2001. In 2000, there
were fifty-two fatalities. In 2001, there were seventy-two. Well, what
does that mean? Using Mr. Overturf’s logic, we should conclude that
speed cameras resulted in a dramatic increase in traffic deaths. Then
they went to fifty in 2002, then back up to sixty-nine in 2003. The
point is, these numbers are too small and too variable to correlated to
traffic enforcement in any way. But if you think you can do that, then
you certainly have an obligation to present the bad with the good and
not pick and choose the numbers you look at.
The reality is that traffic deaths have been trending down nationally
for years, and this probably has much more to do with safety
improvements in cars in the last two decades (as older models without
airbags or antilock brakes are retired) than it does with any local
enforcement effort. But whatever your theory, in DC it's clear these
numbers are way too small to be of any statistical significance. Now
what would be valuable information is actual accident data at locations
where cameras have been installed, before and after. That's an
apples-to-apples comparison of the effect of a camera at the location
it's actually been installed. It measures the change in safety, not the
number of people speeding (which may or may not be related to safety at
any particular location). Where's this data? Why isn't DC touting such
obvious measures of success? [Continued in the next issue of themail]
###############
Can DC Claim Credit for the Decrease in
Traffic Deaths?
Jack McKay,
jack.mckay@verizon.net
Reader Overturf argues (dcwatch, September 12) that DC "must be doing
something right," because the annual traffic fatality count has
decreased substantially in recent years. The MPD also wants credit for
the reduction: "DC's fatalities declined 69 percent in 10 years,
compared to only 28 percent nationwide, and [the MPD] believes its speed
and red light cameras are the reason" (cited in Greater Greater
Washington, August 29). Could these photo enforcement machines be
responsible for the much larger decrease in fatalities in DC, compared
to the country as a whole? Why have traffic fatalities been decreasing,
here and everywhere else? The nationwide fatality rate has been
decreasing steadily for ninety years, and that rate, in fatalities per
vehicle-mile of travel, is only one-twentieth of what it was in 1922.
Safer cars and safer roads are the most likely reasons for this steady
decline.
A salient characteristic of the decline in fatalities in DC is that
it corresponds almost entirely to increased survival in collisions, not
in fewer collisions. Between 2000 and 2009, the number of non-pedestrian
traffic deaths decreased by 63 percent, while the number of collisions
decreased by only 9 percent. Evidently the survivability of automobile
collisions has increased substantially, most likely due to the gradual
replacement of older model cars with newer, safer ones.
Why is the traffic death decline greater in DC than nationwide, or in
any state? Perhaps because the District is totally urbanized, with no
high-speed highways within its boundaries, and the safety measures in
recent-model cars, such as safety-cage structures, air bags, and seat
belts, are more effective at preventing fatal injury in crashes at the
moderate speeds of the city than at highway speeds. It seems most
likely, then, that the decrease in traffic deaths in DC is mainly the
doing of the federal government’s imposing ever more rigorous safety
standards on modern automobiles.
###############
I'm responding to Earl Shamwell’s article in themail [September 12].
I have all respect for Congresswoman Norton, and I'm thankful for all
she has done for DC. However, my associates and I do believe it is time
to turn the torch to someone else be the representative for DC on the
Hill. Whoever is interested in running needs to get out there early, let
the residents of DC know who they are, be sharp, highly intelligent, and
articulate, have a strong backbone/spine and a proven track record of
success. The ideal delegate will not blindside the residents nor sell us
out, and will be successful in getting the residents of DC our rights to
vote.
The residents of DC, not some elected Congress/Senator from another
state, know best what we need because we live here. We pay the highest
taxes in the USA, yet we are not a state and we do not have rights. We
need an assertive, well-equipped, victorious warrior for the residents
of DC who is not afraid to make a stand for the residents of DC and who
will fight an awesome battle to the end that will be victorious for us
in DC. In the Bible, King David defeated Goliath with his faith in God
and a sling shot. Have we in Washington, DC, forgotten what our
ancestors have done for us? If it was not for them -- and it cost some
of them their lives -- we would not be where we are today. Stop being
wimps. Warriors of DC we need to fight for our beautiful city. What
examples are we setting for our children and the youth in the city?
In addition: I strongly believe that, like the President of USA can
only serve two terms, this should be the same for the elected officials
on Capitol Hill and in the Senate. It's the right thing to do.
###############
InTowner
September Issue
P.L. Wolff,
intowner@intowner.com
The September issue content is now posted at
http://www.intowner.com,
including the issue PDF in which will be found a letter from a Corcoran
board member taking issue with our report of last month about the
possibility of the museum’s abandoning its historic building near the
White House, as well as the primary news stories, community news, and
museum exhibition reviews -- plus all photos and other images.
Not included in the PDF but linked directly from the home page are
the new What Once Was (this first month titled “Princess Alice’s
Palace”), which has succeeded the long-running Scenes from the Past as
well as Recent Real Estate Sales, Reservations Recommended, and Food in
the ’Hood. This month's lead stories include the following: 1)
“Contentious Adams Morgan Hotel Project Logjam May Be Broken; Revised
Application Before Zoning Commission Reduces Height”; 2) “Renovated and
Expanded Mt. Pleasant Library Reopens to Great Acclaim”; 3) “Dupont
East’s 17th Street Neighbors Gearing Up for September 22nd Event.”
Our editorial this month addresses the question “What’s the Real Deal
With These New Taxi Meters?” (From the Publisher’s Desk). Your thoughts
are welcome and can be sent by clicking the comment link at the bottom
of the web page or by E-mail to
letters@intowner.com. The next issue PDF will publish early in
the morning of October 12 (the second Friday of the month, as usual).
For more information, either send an email to
newsroom@intowner.com or call
234-1717.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
Tommy Wells at Ward 3 Ward 3 Democratic
Committee, September 20
Shelley Tomkin,
shelltomk@aol.com
Ward 6 Councilmember Tommy Wells will speak before the Ward 3
Democratic Committee on Thursday, September 20, at 7:30 p.m., at St.
Columba's Church, 4201 Albemarle Street, NW. Councilmember Wells will
address a variety of topics including his views on ethics and ampaign
finance reform and issues related to his chairmanship of the DC council
Committee on Libraries, Parks, Recreation, and Planning. He will also
discuss his views on critical issues for the future of the District of
Columbia. There will be a question and answer period following the
presentation. For further information, contact Shelley Tomkin at
shelltomk@aol.com or 363-8387.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published
every Wednesday and Sunday. To change the E-mail address for your
subscription to themail, use the Update Profile/Email address link
below in the E-mail edition. To unsubscribe, use the Safe Unsubscribe
link in the E-mail edition. An archive of all past issues is available
at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should be submitted to
themail@dcwatch.com, and should
be about life, government, or politics in the District of Columbia in
one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to be
printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.
|