The Narrative Continues
Dear Narrators:
David Schwartzman, below, objects to my writing in the last
introduction to themail that the “educational reform” movement
symbolized by Chancellor Michelle Rhee has support from the political
left as well as the political right. I certainly didn’t mean to imply
that either the political left or the political right is united and
unanimous in support of Rhee’s style of education reform. They aren’t,
but the movement has many vocal spokesmen from both sides of the
political spectrum. In the last issue, I cited recent articles in The
New Republic, The Washington Post, Politico, The Root,
New York Times, Time Magazine, and NPR that all, in
various ways, attributed Fenty’s electoral loss to black people’s
shortsighted and irrational opposition to Rhee’s brand of “educational
reform.” David may view these news outlets as being to the right of
his political viewpoint, but I think it’s fair to characterize them as
left of the nation’s political center.
There have been two more notable articles on DC’s primary since
last Sunday’s issue of themail. The first is the most uninformed and
misleading article on DC’s primary that I’ve read in the national
press, and even in the local press. Michael Tanner’s analysis in The
National Review, “Extremist Thrives in Primary Fight: The Party Is
Courting Its Fringes, a Bad Omen for Future Policy,” http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/247275/extremist-thrives-primary-fight-michael-tanner,
makes some extraordinary claims for Adrian Fenty that not even his most
ardent supporters made, and some extraordinary charges against Vincent
Gray that not even the Fenty campaign made. According to Tanner, “The
incumbent was a moderate, a pragmatist, someone who could reach across
the aisle to work with those who were not traditional allies.” The
idea of Fenty’s reaching across the aisle, or even of reaching out to
those on the same side of the aisle, is laughable. “His opponent, on
the other hand,” wrote Tanner, “appealed to the fringes of the
party. He allied himself with powerful special-interest groups who
poured money and manpower into his campaign.” The mounds of money that
powerful special interest groups poured into Gray’s campaign must
explain why Fenty raised five times the campaign funds that Gray did.
Gray and the teachers’ and public employees’ unions, “ran a nasty
and racially charged campaign.” Tanner presents no evidence of Gray’s
being an extremist or fringe candidate, or of running a nasty and
racially charged campaign, because there isn’t any. Gray, like Fenty,
is on the left side of the Democratic party, but Washingtonians in
general certainly didn’t view him as an extremist, and Fenty
supporters never charged him with being one. In addition, except for Ron
Moten’s singular delusion that Fenty would be elected because of the
power of the hip-hop vote, neither campaign made a racially based appeal
— it has been the post-primary attempt to analyze the vote in terms of
race that injected the issue into a campaign in which race wasn’t an
issue.
The other notable article was by Michael Lomax in The Root, “Education
Reform, What Adrian Fenty and Michelle Rhee Got Wrong,” http://tinyurl.com/2bl4jzj.
Lomax wrote an earlier article for The Root that I cited in Sunday’s
issue of themail, “Is DC Mayor Adrian Fenty’s Loss a National Defeat
for Education Reform?” http://tinyurl.com/26gpdjd.
In this earlier article, Lomax explained Fenty’s defeat as a result of
people’s dissatisfaction with Rhee’s and his personalities. “Although
many parents recognized that DCPS needed reform and that part of that
reform needed to be an upgrade in the quality of its classroom teachers,
the suddenness of the changes she [Rhee] made, and the sang-froid of her
reaction to people’s discomfort, didn’t sit well with many
Washingtonians.” By the time he wrote his second article on the
subject, a week later, Lomax had either learned a lot or become much
freer to express his opinions, because in it he gives a much more
adequate explanation: “For three years, DC Public Schools Chancellor
Michelle Rhee promoted the notion that education reform could happen
only if she was totally in charge and everything was done her way. It
was her way — or her way. She justified every policy, every action, by
saying that it was all about the kids, not about adults. Nothing in her
tenure so typified her approach as the ending of it. The day after the
defeat of her patron, Mayor Adrian Fenty, when DCPS students could have
benefited from an example of civility and graciousness in defeat, she
called Fenty’s loss — and, by implication, her own departure — ‘devastating’
for DC children. In the end, it was not about the kids; it was about the
adults, and one adult in particular: her. And that, in many ways, was
the problem. Rhee came to Washington with experience only as a classroom
teacher — for three years, through Teach for America — and as head
of her own nonprofit organization. She had never really worked for
anybody or been institutionally accountable to anyone. She declared ‘cooperation,
collaboration and consensus building [to be] way overrated.’ With
Fenty’s support — or at least without his ever publicly reining her
in — she stiffed the City Council and its chair, Vincent Gray, the man
who defeated Fenty. She stiffed teachers and the union that represented
them. And she stiffed the parents and the predominantly African-American
communities they lived in. She did education reform to blacks, not with
them.” Amen.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
Fraud Alleged in David Catania’s Candidate
Petitions
Richard Urban, candidate for At-Large councilmember, rurban@rufordc.com
In a challenge currently before the DC Board of Elections and Ethics,
I allege fraud in the ballot petitions of David Catania. The case, filed
September 7 and heard on September 17, will be decided by September 22.
The Board of Elections and Ethics will decide whether or not to grant
ballot access to Mr. Catania. Ballot petition circulator Nicholas McCoy
had a number of irregularities in the petitions that he handed in. These
include having widely varying signatures for at least ten different
petition sheets. Petition sheets must be signed by the registered
qualified elector who took the signatures. A forensic handwriting
analyst submitted expert testimony saying that ten signatures submitted
by McCoy did not appear to be his.
Other evidence of petitions circulated by those other than the signer
are nine sheets with scratched out circulator signature dates, one sheet
with a pre-signed signature date (like 7/ / 10), and many partial
signature sheets on certain dates.
There is also the question of whether or not Mr. Catania handed in
three thousand valid signatures in his first petition submission on
August 5. I believe that it is very important for the Board of Elections
and Ethics to maintain the integrity of the signature collection
process.
###############
Study on Underground Electric Lines Available
for Comment
Brenda Pennington, info@opc-dc.gov
The District of Columbia Public Service Commission has issued a
notice of public comment for a study it commissioned from Shaw
Consultants entitled “Study of the Feasibility and Reliability of
Undergrounding Electric Distribution Lines in the District of Columbia.”
The objectives were to review and analyze previous underground studies,
provide costs, feasibility and reliability implications of select
undergrounding alternatives and to examine the potential impact on the
environment, residents, infrastructure, health and safety.
The Commission has now issued an order calling for a public comment
period that will end on October 31. OPC encourages all interested
parties to review the report, which is available online at OPC’s web
site (http://tinyurl.com/299sspp),
or you may view the report at the DC Public Service Commission offices,
1333 H St. NW, 2nd Floor, West Tower, between the hours of 9:00
a.m.-5:30 p.m. Individuals, groups, and businesses wishing to comment on
the report should submit their written statements to the Commission
Secretary, Ms. Dorothy Wideman at 1333 H Street NW, 2nd Floor, West
Tower, Washington, DC 20005, d.wideman@dcpsc.org
no later than the close of business on Friday October 30.
As the report is quite lengthy, OPC encourages you to download the
file from our web site. OPC will also print copies upon request. Please
call OPC at 727-3071 to make your request.
###############
DPW’s New Hazardous Waste Schedule
Kevin B. Twine, kevin.twine@dc.gov
The DC Department of Public Works has a new monthly schedule for
providing household hazardous waste/e-cycling/document shredding
services. Starting Saturday, October 2, residents may bring these items
to the Ft. Totten Transfer Station, 4900 John F. McCormack Road, NE,
once a month on the first Saturday of the month, except holidays,
between 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. The new schedule reflects a reduction in
the Department’s budget for FY 2011, which begins October 1. For a
list of acceptable and unacceptable items, please click on http://tinyurl.com/yht67sl.
This new schedule does not affect residents’ ability to bring bulk
items to Ft. Totten or pick up compost between March and October. For
these services, Ft. Totten will be open weekdays between 1:00 p.m. and
5:00 p.m., and each Saturday, except holidays, between 8:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m.
Directions to Ft. Totten: travel east on Irving Street, NW, turn left
on Michigan Avenue, turn left on John F. McCormack Road, NE, and
continue to the end of the street.
###############
I am requesting that the District of Columbia Housing Authority
Communities move forward. The primary is over, and the voters spoke, “Mayor
Vincent Gray.” It is time for us to think SMART (specific, measurable,
achievable, realistic, time phased). I am requesting that the “New
Communities”: Barry Farm, Lincoln Heights, Park Morton, and Richardson
Dwelling, attend the DCHA Family Commissioner “New Communities”
round table discussion, for the purpose of giving our input on the Fenty
administration’s “New Community” report, at which time our input
will be forward to the Mayor-Elect.
We need to discuss what role the city will have in the process of the
Obama administration’s PETRA (Preservation, Enhancement and
Transformation of Rental Assistance Act) in light of the Preserving
Public Housing: Issues and Options discussions (http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3271).
PETRA calls for converting public and some other subsidized housing to a
new type of Housing Choice Voucher assistance, leveraging public funding
to access private capital to meet public housing preservation needs, and
expanding housing choices for assisted housing residents. The proposal
has far-reaching implications for the future of public housing — and
it has been met with praise and criticism from stakeholders. I am
challenging Resident Council leaderships to call Linda Leakes, of
Empowerment DC (234-9119), to schedule a presentation on this subject
with Linda Couch (NLHP). I am further requesting DCHA Communities to
draw your community plans and submit them to me by January 2011. I have
requested this information for approximately three years. It has been
brought to my attention that several communities are requesting day
centers on the sites. I am requesting the communities’ surveys by
January 2011.
I serve at the pleasure of my constituents. I will submit
documentation to Mayor Gray, as I did to Mayor Fenty. I do not work for
DC government of for the federal government. I am public servant; I owe
no one, with the exception of the unsung voices, in the communities I
live and I serve. The power of community is “The Community.”
###############
The story being told by the press and in the neighborhoods regarding
Fenty’s downfall ignores the most basic truths about Fenty, his
administration, and the last four years. The people behind this story
are employing the same basic strategy that they have for the last four
years, which breaks down to: “Say something enough and people will
believe it is true.” By far the worst of these myths is that Adrian
Fenty is the most progressive and successful mayor in Washington, DC,
history. This is simply not true. The most progressive and successful
mayor in DC history is Anthony Williams, who served two successful terms
during which DC saw more economic growth and renewal then it has since
1968. Penn Quarter, Columbia Heights, Barracks Row, and the H Street
corridor are a testament to what Williams was able to accomplish. This
success was due largely to the inclusive nature of Williams
administration. Williams went out of his way to not only engage
community activists but to actively harness their efforts and
incorporate them into his own to revitalize neighborhoods. I know this
from my own personal experience working to renovate the Ludlow Taylor
Baseball field in northeast ten years ago. Much of the growth and
development we’ve seen under Adrian Fenty can actually be attributed
to Anthony Williams, and people should know that.
Of course for me the fact that Fenty is credited for Williams’ work
is nothing in comparison with Fenty’s blatant and, in my opinion,
criminal cronyism. I have read articles that stated there is absolutely
no proof Fenty had any part in awarding contracts to his frat brothers.
Not true. If you follow the trail it’s actually pretty easy to see
where and how Fenty was involved. Here are links to Mike DeBonis’s
summary of the situation as well as the open letter Bill Slover (former
chair of the Housing Authority) wrote to WAPO. Both illustrate very
clearly the role that Adrian Fenty played: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/debonis/2010/09/bill_slover_challenges_fentys.html,
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/local-opinions/2010/09/mr_fenty_and_the_banneker_cont.html
Even more unbelievable than Fenty’s conduct is the conduct of the
companies he was rewarding with our tax dollars. Below are just a few
stories I found regarding Liberty Engineering, the company owned by
Sinclair Skinner. Some of the key points: 1) Liberty was awarded
contracts to provide surveying for DC despite the fact that they are not
licensed to do surveys. 2) Liberty was paid $358,000 for the 11
surveying contracts they were awarded. 3) Liberty hired a sub to perform
the work and then marked up his fees over 500% (from about $8,000 to
$48,000) to DC. 4) Liberty then refused to pay its sub and, as far as I
can tell, has never actually paid him. http://tinyurl.com/23ld28d,
http://tinyurl.com/yf2jfu5.
Liberty Co-founder Abdullahi Barrow was granted his engineering
license by the Fenty-appointed Board of Professional Engineers despite
the fact that he failed the PE exam seven times. This is not only
completely wrong, it’s dangerous. There’s a reason we license the
professionals responsible for insuring our buildings and bridges are
safe. Possibly more than any other issue this one, at least for me,
illustrates the complete disdain that Adrian Fenty felt for not only his
constituents but also for the thousands of DC workers who served him. I
know people who worked for DDOT under Fenty, and the presumption that
these people were lazy slugs who couldn’t get a job anywhere else but
DC permeated every single decision that came down from Fenty’s office.
Below is a quote from Scott Bolden, the lawyer at large for all of
Fenty’s friends and associates. Reading his quote, I couldn’t help
but wonder what he would have thought if Barrow had been allowed to
practice law after failing the Bar exam seven times. He said any
suggestion that Barrow wasn’t qualified as an engineer was “nonsense.”
“He’s got a master’s degree, he’s got several years of
experience in DC government, he’s got substantial experience in the
public and the private sector over several years, including being a
former chief building inspector for the District government,” Bolden
said. “Sounds like he’s qualified to me regardless of how many
engineering exams he’s taken.” http://tinyurl.com/2djcben
###############
I am so sick and tired of people making my vote for Gray a racial
issue. I voted for him because I thought he was the best candidate for
the position, not because he is African American. You all are forgetting
that Fenty is African American as well. I took issue with Fenty because
of his lack of respect for me as voter. His campaign promise to be
transparent, etc., etc. The list goes on. This has nothing to do with
race. I love Cathy Lanier, and she is white. I like Michelle Rhee, and
she is Korean. I do not necessarily agree with everything that she has
done. I recently adopted an eleven-year-old child, so now I am following
education more closely. I realize that the school system in Northwest
Ward 5 is very different from the school system on Capital Hill and
Upper Northwest. I had to put my child in a charter school because I
could not get him into a better school. Voting against Fenty is no vote
against Michelle Rhee. If Rhee cared about the children and wanted to
make it work she would stay and not publicly make comments about Gray
before at least talking with him. She is playing politics as well. At
the end of the day, it is about the children.
So, please, people stop making this a racial issue. What about the
white people that voted for Vincent Gray? What kind of excuse do you
give them for deciding to vote for the candidate of their choice? Voter
turnout was low. A little over one hundred thousand people voted for the
Mayor. If people were so galvanized by what Fenty had done why didn’t
more voters, particularly white voters come out to support him? I
supported Fenty during the first go around, but I changed my mind this
election. Am I wrong for that? Fenty had a chance to win. He had four
million dollars and all the resources that money could buy. He did not
listen to his advisors. Sound familiar! The media has made this about
race when it is about respect for the citizens that you represent. You
know my choice for mayor, if he would ever run, is David Catania. Guess
what he is — white! Would that mean that I am a racist?
###############
A Religious Test for Politicians
Alvin C. Frost, alvincfrost@msn.com
On this past Sunday, the Washington Post ran an article, “A
Religious Test All Our Political Candidates Should Take,” by Damon
Linker, at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/17/AR2010091702623.html
I would rather find out how the candidates did while they were in school
in areas and subjects such as: 1) Citizenship, 2) whether they played
well with the other children, 3) disciplinary issues, 4) attendance and,
of course, 5) their reading comprehension, computational, and reasoning
skills. In sports, we are constantly told that you only play as well as
you practice. To find out whether you will be a good, or great, mayor,
CEO, chairman, etc., we need to know how you started out your life,
because people tend to follow their early footsteps, which are often
excellent indicators of future success or failure. How about a report
card or two?
Nevertheless, following is my response to the question of a religious
test for candidates. The First Amendment to the US Constitution protects
an individual’s right: 1) to establish a religion, or not; and 2) to
practice a religion, or not. The, so called, “establishment clause”
is taken to mean that the state cannot, and should not attempt to,
establish a “state religion” nor compel citizens to practice such
religion. Having said that, a candidate, or elected official, can use
their religion, if they have or practice one, to inform their beliefs,
decisions, and actions based upon a moral code that may be determined by
their religious or spiritual beliefs. If we are to begin to ask
candidates, or elected officials, about their religions beliefs, I
believe that the “chase is joined,” as Sherlock Holmes might say, as
to when, and how that person’s decisions and actions are a true
reflection of their real beliefs.
One’s official decisions and actions are always open and subject to
discussion, and dissection, and understanding, if possible. Since we can
never get inside another person’s beliefs, understanding, and
reasoning, we will always be forced to attempt to tease out the truth
from the officially stated reasoning and justification for their
decisions and actions. We will be forced to heed, or rely, upon another
Sherlock Holmes witticism, paraphrased here as “The dog that did not
bark.” If we are going to depend upon a politician to tell us why he,
or she, really said, or did, a certain thing, then we will be waiting
for a considerable time. Even those accused of crimes do not normally
confess to the truth, and their actions and culpability, unless
compelled to do so base upon documentation beyond a reasonable doubt and
even then, some politicians will hold to their original story, and
continue to mislead, obfuscate, and, even lie. Unless we begin to
require, and expect, that all candidates, and elected officials, “swear
to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth” upon
the pain and threat of congressional inquiries into perjury and hearings
on “high crimes and misdemeanors,” I don’t know how we could
possibly expect anything that will be demonstrably more effective than
the current situation of uncertainty as to what an elected official
actually believes, or, more importantly, why they make decisions and do
the things that they do, in the name of “the people.”
###############
Theories Are Like Navels, Everybody Has One
Qawi Robinson, qrobinso@lycos.com
After reading countless Washington Post articles and even
Bryce Suderow’s “A Theory of Why So Many Blacks Voted for Vincent
Gray,” I’m almost nauseated over how folks want to paint this
primary as racist. Their handicapping and theories are insulting to
African-Americans and European-Americans. Somehow, they believe that the
citizens can only see color lines and simply vote for levels of melanin
and complexion in a candidate. In case folks have forgotten, both Adrian
Fenty and Vincent Gray have African ancestry. Complexion-wise, Mr. Fenty
is a few shades darker than Mr. Gray, so surely that would make him more
palatable to African-Americans, right? As silly as this sounds, it is
just as silly as what has been written lately regarding how race won or
lost the election for DC mayor. As quiet as the Washington Post
wants to keep it, there are disenfranchised non-African-Americans living
in DC too. Some of them live in Ward 3 and are still smarting from the
Janney School deal. Some live West of 16th Street and do not have
children in DCPS but still didn’t like Fenty’s approach. Some live
in Wards 1 and 2 and, despite all the bike lanes they could have, they
still didn’t appreciate the draconian parking enforcement and lies
about how the “Save the Anacostia Fund” was going to be spent. In
other words, DC is very much a political city that engenders politically
active folks, regardless of what Ward they live in. It took more than
the African-American vote for Barack Obama to win, and the same was true
for Vincent Gray. And folks who blame this on race should be ashamed.
The real way to handicap this election is on the issues, precinct by
precinct. I encourage all who want to whitewash or blackwash (pun
intended) the primary results to go to http://tinyurl.com/274n6z2
and see that Wards 1, 2, 3, and 6 were not exactly slam dunks for Fenty.
Some precincts in those Wards were enthusiastically for Gray. That shows
that more than ethnicity and socioeconomic levels determined the winner.
Finally, as much as I have issues with Adrian Fenty and his
administration, please let the man go out in dignity. Stop talking about
the election, his legacy, accomplishments, etc., and rally behind the
new mayor to be determined in November. That mayor will need DC to be
One City, not one divided amongst racial lines.
###############
I’d like to see an op-ed article in the Washington Post
making the argument that Michelle Rhee’s approach to education is
seriously flawed. It would be a good corrective to the articles that
portray her as the person with all the right answers, if only people
would let her just take care of everything.
I’d like to know if correspondent Bryce Suderow is correct in
saying that Michelle Rhee is Korean. I think she’s American. I want to
be very careful about calling Mr. Suderow a bad name but his item in
today’s themail [September 19] strikes me as possibly displaying a
bigoted mindset.
###############
Alleged Left Support for So-Called Educational
Reform
David Schwartzman, At-Large DC city council candidate, dschwartzman@gmail.com
Please do not put all the political left in one bag, when you claim
“. . . both the political left and the political right have accepted
the top-down, autocratic model of ‘educational reform’ as valid” (themail,
September 19). I know many who identify themselves on the left, as I do,
who strongly reject the Fenty/Rhee top down so-called educational
reform. This is what my campaign brochure says on Education: “Reopen
DC Neighborhood Public Schools. Mayoral control is a failure. Bottom up,
not top down control. Shift funding from bureaucrats to students and
teachers. Rehire unjustly fired teachers and staff! Limit access of
military recruiters, no JROTC in DC Schools.”
###############
The Narrative
Richard Rothblum, richard@rothblum.org
Gary, you say [themail, September 19] that the narrative of the Fenty-Gray
race is being written now, and either of two views is being propounded.
As a product of east of the park DC public schools, I have a take that
extends to before the reign of Marion Barry, back to the forties and
fifties. My narrative is further informed by Mr. Gray’s campaign
promises. Under Gray, it will be impossible to fire any incompetent
teacher or administrator of any race and at any level. This is exactly
what caused the DC system to fall from being one of the best (students
from the suburbs paid tuition to attend DC public schools) to its
present state.
When integration commenced in DC in 1954, my dad and mom wanted to
give the new system the benefit of the doubt. They were the furthest
thing from racists. My dad served in a nearly all-black unit in the
Army. The “N-word” was not permitted in our house. My brothers and I
were the only white kids in DC to attend school on opening day of the
integrated system in the fall of 1954, so far as I know. For sure, we
were the only ones at Elliot Junior High and Eastern High. By 1956, it
became apparent to Mom and Dad that education of children was being
sacrificed on behalf of political objectives and job preservation. Good
and competent teachers who had made a determination to stay to support
their students were leaving the system in droves. We sold our house in
an integrated neighborhood in northeast, long after most other white
families with children had bailed to the ’burbs. Dad explained to me
that he and Mom figured that Sam and I would have been able to weather
the problems, but that they couldn’t risk my youngest brother, Eddie,
who had another six years or so in the system. The demise of public
education in DC followed.
This is what I see happening again, after the brief interlude of the
Fenty-Rhee era. Soon, not only politicians like Mr. Gray, whose petulant
second-guessing of Ms. Rhee’s actions is well known, but the unions as
well will have their oar in the water. The school “chancellor” will
have to be black, regardless of any other factors. Everyone’s opinion
will be taken into account, no one will be discomfited or offended, nor
will poor children be educated. Mr. Gray will implement his campaign
promises to waste the money that could be spent on educating children on
demonstrably ineffective adult training programs, and on trying to find
jobs for illiterate products of a failed system. He will pour scarce
education dollars down the UDC rathole, instead of subsidizing tuition
to the many fine universities in the area. Unions will be encouraged to
continue sabotaging charter schools. Failure will continue to be built
upon failure. These are my observations from direct experience, and Mr.
Gray’s announced intentions. If this is not “devastating” as
described by Ms. Rhee, it is at least a plan for devastation.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
The Festival is a collaborative effort by the Advisory Neighborhood
Commission, Dupont Circle Community Association, Historic Dupont Circle
Main Streets, and Ross Elementary School PTA. An art show featuring
fifty local artists will run from Q to R Streets. There will be musical
performances at Church Street, lots of kid friendly activities along R
Street and at Ross School playground, and a pet zone at Riggs Place.
Area nonprofits will have booths. You can even purchase House Tour
tickets.
The impetus for the Festival was promoting our enhanced community
after completion of the streetscape. Even before road work began, local
leaders planned ways to offset the impact on residents and businesses.
In particular, no one wanted a repeat of the fiasco on P Street when we
lost several businesses including local favorite Mark and Orlando’s
restaurant. There was great consternation, as well, about the fate of
17th Street trees, many of which were initially slated for removal, but
most of which have been saved. Volunteers are needed for the art show
and the festival in general. To volunteer, contact Debby Hanrahan, debbyhanrahan@yahoo.com
###############
National Building Museum Events, October 1
Johanna Weber, jweber@nbm.org
October 1, 10:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., Designing Tomorrow: America’s
World’s Fairs of the 1930s. Members are invited to view the Museum’s
newest exhibition, Designing Tomorrow: America’s World’s Fairs of
the 1930s before the public, and enjoy a tour with exhibition
co-curators Laura Burd Schiavo and Deborah Sorensen at 12:30 p.m. Free,
members only. Tour space limited; RSVP for tour by Friday, September 24,
to Katherine Potosky at 272-2448, ext. 3456 or kpotosky@nbm.org.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — CONTEST
Create Dupont Circle’s Empanada — The
Duponada!
Robin Diener, president@dupont-circle.com
A recipe contest from PANAS and Fresh Farm Markets: Using ingredients
from Dupont’s Fresh Farm Market, create your own empanada. Develop a
whole recipe or simply list your four main ingredients. Drop the recipe
at PANAS, 2029 P Street, NW, or E-mail to order@panasgourmet.com,
subject: Duponada. The deadline is September 24. On Sunday, October 3, a
panel of distinguished food writer/bloggers will select the top three
entries, to be served during the week of October 4 through 8, at Panas
where customers will vote for their favorite. The winner will be
announced at Panas Gourmet Empanadas on October 10. The Duponada will be
added to the menu at Panas, and proceeds from its sale will go to
benefit the projects of DCCA.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To change the E-mail address for your subscription
to themail, use the Update Profile/Email address link below in the
E-mail edition. To unsubscribe, use the Safe Unsubscribe link in the
E-mail edition. An archive of all past issues is available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com, and should
be about life, government, or politics in the District of Columbia in
one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to be printed,
and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief paragraphs
would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can be put into
each mailing.
