Running Wild
Dear Speed Demons:
I haven’t written anything about red-light cameras recently, but on
March 7 the Florida Public Health Review (link to the PDF report
at http://hsc.usf.edu/publichealth/fphr/index.htm)
published a short comprehensive review of studies of red light cameras
that concluded that the cameras increase revenues for government and
private interests and increase the risk to public safety. They cause
more accidents and injuries and decrease the safety of drivers and
passengers, but they create profits for the governments that authorize
them and the private companies that run them. To which I assume the
reaction of DC’s government officials will be, “Did they say how to
increase profits the most?” For those who doubt that, consider this:
Dallas is considering scaling back its red-light camera program because
it’s no longer running at a profit (http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/stories/DN-redlights_15met.ART.North.Edition1.468120d.html).
Here’s the abstract of the paper: “Running a red light can cause
severe traffic crashes especially when one vehicle runs into the side of
another. Red light cameras photograph violators who are sent traffic
tickets by mail. Intuitively, cameras appear to be a good idea. However,
comprehensive studies conclude cameras actually increase crashes and
injuries, providing a safety argument not to install them. Presently,
Florida statutes do not permit red light camera evidence to be used as
the sole basis for ticketing drivers for violating the law. Legislation
to permit camera citations has been proposed since the 1990s, but none
has passed to date. This paper explains red light running trends in
Florida; effective solutions to reduce red light running; findings from
major camera evaluations; examples of flawed evaluations; the automobile
insurance financial interest in cameras; and the increased likelihood of
even higher crash and injury rates if cameras are used in Florida due to
the high percent of elderly drivers and passengers. The theory behind
red light cameras as potentially effective is that they rely on
deterring red light running primarily through punishment of a specific
driving behavior and secondarily by changing drivers’ experience.
Because the rigorous and robust studies conclude that cameras are
associated with increased crashes and costs, any economic analysis of
cameras should include these newly generated costs to the public.
Indirect costs to the public are usually not considered in the
calculation of total revenues and profits generated from red light
cameras. Florida should be cautious in using traffic safety information
from the automobile insurance industry. Insurance financial goals are to
increase their revenues and profits, which do not necessarily include
reducing traffic crashes, injuries or fatalities. Also, public policy
should avoid conflicts of interest that enhance revenues for government
and private interests at the risk of public safety.”
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
Safe Schools Is the First Priority
Mai Abdul Rahman, maiabdulrahman@comcast.net
The safety and security of our children while in school is DCPS’s
responsibility by law. DCPS’s ineffectual school policies and their
failure to address the factors that have contributed to the increased
level of violence in our schools are jeopardizing our children’s
safety. Although school crime and violence have been major concerns for
our school administrators for many years, our public schools’ climate
was relatively still under control. This year’s unusual spike in the
acts of violence at Wilson, Ballou, Cardozza, Anacostia, and other city
high schools is quiet alarming and merits serious concern. The reasons
are many and directly stem from DCPS’s recent policies and its central
administration’s inability to advance effective and comprehensive
policies and a strategic plan that address our schools’ diverse
student needs. Poor planning lack of institutional knowledge of our
schools by central administration, poorly staffed and weak school
administrators, and the failed ninth grade transition plan are
responsible for the continued violence in our public high schools. Also,
the inclusion of ninth grade students who have come directly from group
homes, Oak Hill, the Department of Youth Rehabilitation Service Center,
and Choice — many of whom are students who have been socially promoted
and many years older than their thirteen to fourteen-year-old peers,
with little in school support for their specific needs — are also
factors that have contributed to the increased violent crimes in our
city schools.
DC’s overall juvenile crime rate in the last two months of this
year will soon surpass all violent crimes of 2007, a flag that has yet
to capture our Chancellor’s attention. This violent and criminal trend
is clearly manifested in all DCPS schools. At Wilson, two hundred
criminal incidents were reported this school year. Last month alone,
detectives and police have made six in-school student arrests, with
several assaults committed by Wilson students after school at nearby
Metro stations in the Wilson neighborhood, in addition to two school
lock-downs. MPD’s online record report a total of juvenile crimes
committed from January through February 23 at 564, compared to 1,940
juvenile crimes reported for the entire year in 2007. Despite this
alarming overall increase in juvenile violent and delinquent behavior,
DCPS has yet to respond to this trend, allowing this school’s violent
culture to fester and take hold in all our schools. According to Bortman
of NYU “anti social behavior is not hardwired.” He contends that
aggressive delinquent teens have abnormal stress social responses; they
are less aware of appropriate “social cues.” Since DCPS insists on
including children from group homes, Oak Hill, Choice, and DYSR with the
general school population they are obligated to acculturate, socialize,
and teach these children according to their needs. This cannot be
achieved by warehousing them in large schools and large classrooms where
their special needs are not met or addressed by skilled teachers or
staff. Otherwise our only option will continue to be suspensions,
expulsions, and incarceration. This policy guarantees the eventual
return of these violent students back into our schools and our
neighborhood streets as repeat offenders, jeopardizing the safety of our
children and the community at large.
The lack of school specific programs, long-term strategies and
comprehensive social services that deal with these delinquent students
and the root problems of their violent behavior is subjecting our
children to fierce attacks in their schools with little regard from
school administrators and DCPS to the emotional and physical scars all
our children must endure (whether victims, perpetrators, or witnesses to
crime). The Chancellor and other DCPS administrators’ disregard of the
root cause of school violence, as they advance policies that are
primarily borrowed from other cities, concocted by consultants without
regard to our student’s diverse specific needs, has been detrimental
to our schools and our children. In addition, our city officials’
refusal to address the core reasons for the failures of our system or
the adequate flushing and scrutiny of the Chancellor’s school plans
that are neither reflective of our children’s’ organic needs or our
city have compounded the problem. DCPS’s indifference to address this
increasing violent culture taking hold in our schools and the profound
impact it has on our children’s safety, school climate and the
teaching and learning school environment will carry a huge cost for our
city, considering that by law schools are responsible for the safety,
security, and education of all our children.
###############
State of the District and Its Schools
Dorothy Brizill, dorothy@dcwatch.com
On Friday, Mayor Fenty delivered his 2008 State of the District
address at the Washington Seniors Wellness Center in Ward 7 (http://www.dcwatch.com/mayor/080314.htm).
In his speech, titled “Getting the Job Done,” the mayor details the
accomplishments of his administration and takes credit for the delivery
of basic city services: 1.5 million meals were provided to thirty
thousand students, MPD responded to 700,000 calls, Fire and Emergency
Medical Services answered 165,000 calls, 1.5 million condoms were
distributed, 225,000 potholes were filled, six miles of roadway were
paved, and 116,000 drivers licenses were processed. Fenty also takes
credit for initiatives that actually originated in the Williams
administration: increasing MPD uniformed officers to four thousand,
putting computers in patrol cars, rehabilitating Frederick Douglass
Bridge, redeveloping the old Convention Center site, completing the DC
USA project in Columbia Heights, moving forward with the Park Morton New
Community project, and opening the Giant grocery store at Camp Simms.
The speech doesn’t detail any new policy or program initiatives that
the Fenty administration will undertake in the coming year or fund in
his 2009 budget, which will be forwarded to the city council on March
20.
Also on Friday, School Chancellor Michelle Rhee and Cornelia M.
Ashby, the Director of Education, Workforce, and Income Security at the
US Government Accountability Office, testified on DC public schools
before the Senate Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management,
the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia. In Ashby’s
testimony (http://www.dcpswatch.com/mayor/080314.htm),
the GAO notes that “the mayor’s team has not yet developed a
long-term districtwide strategic education plan. Given the significant
transformation underway, a strategic plan could provide a framework for
coordinating the work of the education offices and assessing short-term
and long-term progress. Without a plan that sets priorities,
implementation goals, and timelines, it may be difficult to measure
progress over time and determine if the District is truly achieving
success. Additionally, a districtwide strategic education plan would
increase the likelihood that the District’s education offices work in
unison toward common goals and that resources are focused on key
priorities, not non-critical activities. A strategic plan could also
help determine when mid-course corrections are needed.” GAO notes that
the District’s response to this recommendation is that “the Deputy
Mayor’s [Victor Reinoso, Deputy Mayor for Education] preferred
approach is to develop a formal process, rather than a written document,
to ensure efforts are coordinated and executed as efficiently as
possible.” In her testimony (http://www.dcpswatch.com/mayor/080314b.htm),
Rhee details the accomplishments of her “transition year.” The
closest she comes to acknowledging GAO’s recommendation is that she
states that “we are solving the problems that need to be solved. . . .
However, this system needs more than solving problems one by one.”
###############
Friday the mayor held a State of the District of Columbia address [http://www.dcwatch.com/mayor/080314.htm].
The problem was that the people who live in the District were not
invited! Previous mayors have invited all that could fit into the
Lincoln Theater. Fenty didn’t feel like the taxpayers had a right to
hear just where he has or has not taken this city.
But he did invite twenty-four people from Dallas, Texas, to hear how
DC is doing. So shouldn’t the taxpayers have been afforded the same
respect?
Past State of DC speeches were attended by all councilmembers; Friday’s
only had three or four. So if only seventy people were there and
twenty-four were not DC residents, then only forty-six DC residents
should pay their taxes. Right?
###############
State of the District Address
Jonathan Rees and Albert Bartee, corruptones2008@verizon.net
In the State of the District Address, Mayor Adrian Fenty attempted to
take full credit for all the outward changes in the physical appearance
of our public schools, which he has no right to do. The truth is, all
that voters now see is the result of the acts and plans that were
committed to by former DC Mayor Anthony Williams, and which Fenty
inherited. This fact may be why none of the local media was impressed
with Fenty’s State of the District Address, with the Washington
City Paper calling it “not noteworthy”! See http://tinyurl.com/3d92kw.
Fenty has taken advantage of the fact that most voters are ignorant
of who did what, when, and where, and has been grossly untruthful. He
acts as if he should be credited for what voters now see taking place,
when in fact, Fenty had little if anything to do with it other than
maybe a few slaps of paint, a door knob or two, and a few windows.
Voters need to educate themselves better on what our leaders really have
done, otherwise they will again allow themselves to be deceived by Fenty
and people like him.
The DC Police paid us a recent visit concerning our public criticism
of Mayor Fenty, and asked our publisher why we cannot say anything nice
about Mayor Fenty. Simple, he hasn’t done anything worth praising, but
he spews out a lot of hype, frauds, and more.
###############
Recently (themail, January 20) I observed that DC drivers seem to
think, erroneously, that they are forbidden from intruding on a bike
lane, even if they’re about to turn right. Last week, a Mount Pleasant
resident posted this on a neighborhood site: “I can’t count the
number of times I’ve driven up Tilden to Connecticut Avenue and seen
cars squeezing between the line of traffic and the parked cars to drive
on the bike lane to make their right turn. . . . I always hug the line
so they can’t get through.”
Well, what’s wrong with drivers using the bike lane to do a
right-on-red? The fact is, drivers turning right are allowed into the
bike lane for a right turn. DCMR 18, 2220.2: “During restricted hours,
any vehicle may enter a restricted right curb lane solely for the
purposes of taking on or discharging passengers or to make a right turn
where a right turn is not otherwise prohibited by any official traffic
control device.” Furthermore, drivers are legally required to enter
the bike lane for a right turn. DCMR 18, 2203.3: “Both the approach
for a right turn and a right turn shall be made as close as practicable
to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway.” What we bicyclists don’t
want is to come up alongside a car that’s off to the left, “respecting”
the bike lane, then be taken by surprise when that car turns right.
Westbound Tilden at Connecticut is a good right-on-red, because
northbound Connecticut traffic is stopped by a left-turn cycle of the
light. Unfortunately, the “no parking to intersection” sign is put
right up at the intersection, when it’s supposed to be forty feet
back. Parked cars make the right-on-red very difficult, unless you’re
good at “squeezing by,” and no self-righteous driver is
intentionally blocking the bike lane.
###############
Ridding the City of the Unwanted
Clyde Howard, ceohoward@hotmail.com
Loosed upon the sleeping residents of LeDroit Park is an organization
that has collected the Lot and Square numbers of every property in
LeDroit Park. This organization, with the collaboration of the Board of
Condemnation, coerces certain residents of the community to either fix
up their property, sell it, or face condemnation proceedings against
them. This organization does not wear blackjack boots, brown shirts and
pants, or wear arm bands and caps and Sam Brown belts, but they are
carrying out the same practices to rid the community of people they
consider undesirables or the unwanted. And they are doing it with the
cooperation of the very government that is supposed to protect the
citizens. These tactics can expand to every community in the city as a
method of pushing more of the unwanted out of the city. So wake up you
sleeping residents of LeDroit Park, the enemy is at the gates. Be
prepared to do battle, for the alarm has sounded. Do you want the fence
around LeDroit Park, that was removed in the late 19th and early 20th
centuries, to return? This organization is laying the ground work for
such a fence to be erected. Martin Luther King, Jr., stated, “Nothing
in the world is more dangerous than a sincere ignorance and
conscientious stupidity.” So be warned, there is work to be done.
###############
Excellent Service from the Mayor’s Office of
Constituent Services
Pete Ross, pete@ross-usa.com
I want to write something good that occurred with the Mayor’s
Office of Constituent Services, even though it was a minor problem. My
wife and I have had a vanity license tag (MR, which are her initials) on
one of our cars for over thirty years. We purchased a new car, and the
new car was titled in both or our names. We were told by the Department
of Motor Vehicles that we could not transfer the vanity tags to our new
car because the old car was titled only in my name. The only way that
vanity tags could be transferred is if the new car were titled exactly
as the old car.
After exhausting all avenues of appeal (including calls to the
director of the DMV that were ignored), I contacted the Mayors Office of
Constituent Services. Gilberto Solano followed up and had to write
numerous E-mails to the DMV, many of which the DMV ignored. However, his
persistence on this relatively minor problem finally paid off, and the
DMV finally consented to permit the transfer of the vanity tag.
Through the whole process, which took almost a month, it is shocking
that the bureaucracy at the DMV took so long to take care of such a
minor problem. The fact that the DMV did not even respond to the Mayor’s
Office of Constituent Services shows how entrenched and out of touch the
DMV is with the residents of DC.
###############
Georgia Tech President to Lead Smithsonian
Gabe Goldberg, gabe at gabegold dot com
A year after a financial scandal forced the head of the Smithsonian
Institution to resign, the organization announced Saturday that it had
named a highly regarded university president, G. Wayne Clough of the
Georgia Institute of Technology, as its chief: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/16/us/16smithsonian.html?th&emc=th.
###############
Daytime Residential Street Sweeping Resumes
March 24
Nancee Lorn, nanceelorn@yahoo.com
The Department of Public Works (DPW) has announced that daytime
mechanical street sweeping will resume in heavily trafficked residential
neighborhoods on Monday, March 24. Alternate-side parking restrictions
in these areas will go into effect as well. Parking tickets, which carry
a $30 fine, will be issued, beginning March 31, to vehicles parked
during street sweeping hours in areas posted with “No Parking/Street
Cleaning” signs. Additionally, parked cars may be towed to allow the
sweepers access to the curbside. Generally, parking is prohibited for
two hours while sweeping is underway.
When street sweepers are able to successfully complete their route,
the pay off is tremendous. Based on a recent study, each mile swept
mechanically removes ten pounds of grease and oil, three pounds of
nitrates and phosphates, and, one to two pounds of heavy metals. DPW
street sweepers cover about four thousand lane miles monthly, removing
litter by brushing it onto a conveyor system, which transports the
material into a debris hopper. The sweeper also emits a fine spray of
water to help control dust. Street sweeping is suspended during winter
as the sprayed water can freeze on the street and cause dangerous
driving conditions. For more about DPW’s street cleaning program,
visit http://www.dpw.dc.gov.
###############
Allow me to elaborate on Peter Orvetti’s posting to themail of
March 12. I, too, am a devoted inner city urban dweller. I grew up in a
small town out west and eventually concluded that twenty-five years in
such a place was enough to last me the rest of my life. I moved into the
big city thirty-five years ago and have not abandoned my love for either
its glory or its occasional squalid spectacle. Like Mr. Orvetti, I am
sometimes greeted with skepticism for this urban bias of mine.
I like to reply with a story from my youth. Then a new college
student not twenty years old, I held a job busing the lunch tables at a
stately “home for elderly ladies” near the campus. My cash salary
was negligible; busboys were compensated “in kind,” with huge
servings of food back in the kitchen, after our day’s work was done.
(In those days, a young scholar of limited means rightly prized one
great big meal every day.) The cook was an old farm woman, a preacher’s
widow who could load a table with prodigious amounts of plain but very
good country food. While we “boys” (as she called us) vacuumed up
those lunches, she would entertain us with gossip from earlier days with
her late husband on the quiet and supposedly safe back roads.
Ministers are privy, quite naturally, to the most intimate and lurid
details of their flock’s domestic lives. It’s possible that this old
widow liked to exaggerate her stories for the amusement of young males
trying to eat, but the horrors she described — the grotesque violence
folks inflicted on one another in those isolated farmsteads and villages
— curdled my blood and made the worst crimes of our fair city seem
like old news. She convinced me that living in a place like Washington
could not be much more dangerous than it is out there, beyond the
fringes. In DC and other cities, victims of crime and abuse are at least
theoretically within reach of help — not stranded in the hills or
valleys, miles from any hope of rescue. As Mr. Orvetti points out, there
is much to recommend the bustle of city living — the wealth of
activity, the noise of it all, the hordes of people, and all the good
things they have to offer.
###############
DCPS Firings
Ted Gest, tgest (at) sas.upenn.edu
I’m just picking up on your “firing” comments of March 9. What
is the evidence that fired DC school employees were not allowed to take
their personal belongings? Both of the stories you link to say they were
allowed to do so. Also, what exactly are the “due process” rights
you keep referring to? As you note, the city council gave the
administration the power to fire people it deemed unnecessary or below
standard. Are you saying these people should have the right to say they
are necessary? I can’t defend every detail of the way these firings
were carried out, but we have had many years of promises to clean up the
administration of the school system here and little seems to have
happened until now. Whether it will be effective, we don’t yet know.
[Tom Sherwood reported on WRC-TV that employees were not given the
ability to retrieve their personal possessions from their desks: “The
letter the employees received said they were being sent home immediately
and that they would be fired in 15 days. Those days will count as
administrative leave. The employees were told they could come back later
to clean out their desks” (http://www.nbc4.com/education/15528102/detail.html).
Employees were stripped of their due process rights, so they don’t
have any complaint about not being given due process? Do you really want
to make that argument? — Gary Imhoff]
###############
This is to advise that the March 2008 on-line edition has been
uploaded and may be accessed at http://www.intowner.com. Included are
the lead stories, community news items and crime reports, editorials
(including prior months’ archived), restaurant reviews (prior months’
also archived), and the text from the ever-popular “Scenes from the
Past” feature (the accompanying images can be seen in the archived PDF
version). The complete issue (along with prior issues back to January
2002) also is available in PDF file format directly from our home page
at no charge simply by clicking the link in the Current & Back
Issues Archive. Here you will be able to view the entire issue as it
appears in print, including all photos and advertisements.
The next issue will publish on April 11 (the second Friday of the
month, as always). The complete PDF version will be posted by the
preceding night or early that Friday morning at the latest, following
which the text of the lead stories, community news, and selected
features will be uploaded shortly thereafter. To read this month’s
lead stories, simply click the link on the home page to the following
headlines: 1) “Major Retail Center Finally Opens in Columbia Heights
— Great Excitement Generated in Neighborhood and Citywide”; 2) “Harris
Teeter Approved for Beer & Wine Sales — Opening Set for April 23”;
3) “Controversial Project at 14th and U Near Final OK Despite
Objections.”
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
Mendelson to Hold Town Halls on Taxes, March
18-25
Jason Shedlock, jshedlock@dccouncil.us
Councilmember Phil Mendelson (At-Large) would like to announce a
series of five Town Hall meetings focusing on the District’s recently
announced tax assessments. The workshops are designed both to educate
residents on the tax assessment process as well as to help taxpayers
utilize the appeal process. Representatives from the District’s Office
of Tax and Revenue will join Mendelson at each of the workshops to
answer questions. This year’s series of workshops marks the sixth
consecutive year that Mendelson has held such meetings throughout the
District.
According to the District’s Office of Tax and Revenue, residential
property assessments have slowed in growth compared to recent years,
rising about 2.3 percent. Residents have until April 1, to begin the
appeals process if they feel the proposed 2009 assessment does not
reflect the market value of their property. If you have any questions,
feel free to contact Celeste Duffie at cduffie@dccouncil.us
or 724-8137.
Upcoming Tax Workshops: March 18, Near Southwest, MPD 1st District
Headquarters, 415 4th Street, SW, 6:30-7:45 p.m. March 20, Anacostia/Barry
Farms, Washington Highlands Library, 115 Atlantic Street, SW, 6:30-7:45
p.m. March 22, Woodridge/Brentwood, Woodridge Library, 1801 Hamlin
Street, NE, 11:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. March 24, Marshall Heights/Lilly
Ponds, Marshall Heights Community Development Corporation, 3939 Benning
Road, NE, 6:30-7:45 p.m. March 25, Chevy Chase, Chevy Chase Community
Center, 5601 Connecticut Avenue, NW, 6:30-7:45 p.m.
###############
Spotlight on Design: Emerging Voices, March 20
Jazmine Zick, jzick@nbm.org
Thursday, March 20, 6:30-8:00 p.m. Spotlight on Design: Emerging
Voices. Presented in partnership with the Architectural League of New
York, Emerging Voices turns the spotlight on architecture firms just
beginning to achieve prominence in the profession. This program will be
held at Virginia Tech’s Alexandria campus. Register for events at http://www.nbm.org.
Free. Registration required.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — HELP WANTED
Video Production Company
Sharon Rubins, serubins@aol.com
Megaphone Project, an award-winning video producer located in
Baltimore, MD, is seeking a talented and versatile Executive Director
who can excel at both the business and creative aspects of this newly
created post. The roles will be varied: chief administrator and manager,
strategic thinker, spokesperson, producer, advisor and mentor to other
staff and crews, marketing expert, message master, policy translator,
primary contact with foundations and donors, board liaison, and
all-around key to the continued success of this vital organization. A
flexible nature, entrepreneurial, can-do spirit, and high energy would
be assets for this demanding and exciting job.
In Baltimore’s advocacy community, Megaphone has developed a
sterling reputation for creating powerful messages via short video
documentaries that stimulate change. The founding director will be
moving on, creating the need for a new organizational head. For more
information, go to http://www.megaphoneproject.org.
To apply, please send a cover letter, resume, and any work sample links
to megaphoneexecutive08@gmail.com.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To change the E-mail address for your subscription
to themail, use the Update Profile/Email address link below in the
E-mail edition. To unsubscribe, use the Safe Unsubscribe link in the
E-mail edition. An archive of all past issues is available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.