Divestment
Dear Divested:
This city’s administration has a policy of divesting the city of
some of its most important assets, with its most valuable public
buildings at the top of the list of the properties that it wants to
dispose of. The Kelly administration pushed forward with the foolish
idea of ridding the government of its finest early twentieth century
building, the Wilson Building, built 1904-1908. Now the Williams
administration wants to dispose of the government’s finest
mid-twentieth century building, the Mies van der Rohe-designed Martin
Luther King, Jr., central library, built 1968-1972, which Alexander
Padro has called “the most distinguished building ever built by the
District government.” Next up for disposal are the school buildings
that have anchored our neighborhoods.
In the library case, the Williams administration has no good argument
for replacing the van der Rohe building with an office box to be built
on the awkward triangular site the administration has designated on the
old convention center’s footprint. The administration has made some
demonstrably false arguments — that the current building could not be
retrofitted for modern uses such as computers (of course it could be,
just as the Wilson Building, the New York Public Library, and the
Library of Congress have been); that a new building would be more
affordable (though even the administration’s own worst-case estimate
of renovating the current library is millions of dollars less than its
best-case estimate of building a new library); that it would involve
less disruption to services to build a new library than to renovate the
current one (though there is no reason to believe that a well-planned
renovation would involve more disruption than closing the current
library and moving all of its collections and services to a new
building); and that the federal government has dedicated $30 million to
building a new central library (it hasn’t — the $30 million can be
spent on anything in the library system, including renovating the
current building). But the administration, which has labored to prevent
any public discussion of its plan in the past, has not even attempted to
make an argument for why its plan should be rushed through the city
council as part of the budget process, without a thorough public airing
of the alternatives. At Saturday’s hastily called “town meeting”
on the plan, Mayor Williams showed ugly, uninspired
"conceptual" drawings of his proposed new library, but
cautioned that there were no architectural plans and that the conceptual
drawings were only to show that it was possible to squeeze a library
into the oddly shaped parcel. (To be fair, that isn’t exactly how he
phrased it.) The mayor’s budget for a new library — again, a
best-case budget — comes up $40 million short for financing, but the
administration and its supporters airily assured Councilmember
Patterson, who held the meeting, that it would be easier to fill that
gap by raising contributions from donors to build a new building than it
would be to raise money to preserve and renovate a building that is
important in our city’s architectural history, like the Martin Luther
King, Jr., Library.
Nevertheless, this is going to happen, and the council will pass it
as part of the budget support act on May 9, unless councilmembers act
quickly to remove it from the budget, and to demand that it be submitted
as a separate bill. Councilmember Patterson has indicated that she may
be inclined to recommend that, but unless she acts soon, and unless she
is supported by Chairman Cropp and other councilmembers, it will happen,
and we haven’t
heard anything from any of them. If you want to weigh in with your
councilmember, this is your only chance.
Gary Imhoff, themail@dcwatch.com
Dorothy Brizill, dorothy@dcwatch.com
PS: Because of a glitch in my E-mail program, I’ve lost the E-mails
to themail that were sent on Thursday and early Friday. If you submitted
something that isn’t in this issue, please send it again. Sorry for
the inconvenience. — Gary Imhoff
###############
Convention Center Won’t Provide FY2005
Financial Statements
Lawrence Sprowls, Dupont Circle, wdccruise@aol.com
After nine requests over two months, the Washington Convention Center
Authority (WCCA) has failed to provide FY2005 financial statements to me
or to post them on its web site. The WCCA’s fiscal year ended
September 2005. My first two February E-mails to Theresa DuBois, WCCA
Community Relations Manager, were ignored. She responded to a voice-mail
message by writing that the annual report was “at the printer” and
would be posted to the web site in three to four weeks. Huh? The 2004
annual report is a PDF and the financial statements were obviously
prepared on a word processor.
A request to Reba Pittman, Acting General Manager, for the
information was ignored. On March 9 I E-mailed a FOIA request to
Reginald Smith, FOIA Officer. Ignored. Follow-up phone call? Ignored.
Mr. Smith responded to a third message by telling me that he knew about
the DuBois request and that the WCCA had fifteen days to respond to any
FOIA request. OK, so March 24 came and went. Today is April 22.
In FY2004, WCCA survived on a $62-million taxpayer subsidy. It wants
a taxpayer-subsidized hotel. But, nearly seven months after the close of
the fiscal year, it won’t disclose its finances to the public.
###############
DC Library System (Not)
Ron Leve, Dupont Circle, theron@comcast.net
I guess you can call me one of Tony Williams’ 100,000. I moved into
the District two years ago and attended Saturday’s “town meeting”
at the MLK library, as I’ve been appalled at the state of the DC
Public Library System — even allowing for having been spoiled by the
outstanding system in Howard County, where I previously lived. What
fascinated me at the meeting was this fantasy world of anthropomorphism
that pervaded the discussions. Much was of the current situation was
laid at the feet of the MLK building, while great wonders were to be
achieved by a 21st-century building at the old convention center. Now I
grant that a new spirit among the professional staff might result from
the improvements brought by a modern building (or a renovated MLK, for
that matter), but the same old gang would be in charge, the ones who
have allowed the MLK and the branches to so seriously deteriorate in the
first place and who haven’t managed to provide temporary facilities
for the four branches currently being renovated.
Until Saturday, I hadn’t understood the surreptitious manner in
which the proposal for the new building has occurred, even before groups
appointed to study the situation have completed their reports or, as I
gather in the case of one set up by the city council, even been
appointed. As someone stated, “what’s the rush”? I don’t have
much knowledge of municipal finance, but the $180 million proposal
seemed awfully shaky, especially the likelihood that $40 million could
be raised privately. No more than conceptual drawings are available for
consideration for this massive investment. And, the real downer for me
was a sentence read from the proposed legislation that the mayor would
delegate total responsibility to the Library Board of Trustees for the
project.
While I generally favor renovation of the current MLK, I cannot even
bring myself to favor that proposal, let alone the new building, with
the current Library management. Can you imagine their managing either
project, involving at least $100 million dollars, successfully? I
certainly can’t. It may seem wishy-washy, but supporting anything that’s
on the table requires an act of faith for which there is no foundation.
###############
Use of Excess School Property
A. Loikow, Cleveland Park, aloikow@verizon.net
As a longtime DC resident, I am very concerned about the city’s
selling public property that we might need in the future, but will be
unable to ever afford to repurchase. The size of the school system and
the number of schools needed is directly related to the quality of the
system. It is clear that a large part of the decrease in the number of
students in the DC public school system is caused by parents’ concerns
about the quality of the education the system offers. As the system
improves, children going to private schools will come back to the public
system.
In looking at whether to retain public school buildings, we tend to
only look at current public school enrollment. Instead, we should look
at our total population, including the total number of children,
demographic trends, and whether we want to increase the city’s
population. School properties are located in neighborhoods all over the
city to serve the residents of those neighborhoods conveniently. When we
don’t need the schools at a point in time, we should look to retaining
public ownership of the property and finding appropriate public uses for
those properties. Land in the city is a very scarce commodity and the
government should be very stingy about giving it up to private
developers for short term profit. Once it is gone from the public
inventory, we will be very unlikely to get it ever again.
Schools that are scheduled to be closed should first be leased to a
public charter school if at all possible. Charter schools are public
schools, but just subject to different oversight. It is much to be
preferred that the public funds they get for facilities go to improving
District owned buildings. If by any chance the charter school leasing
such a building closes, the public funds that went to improving it will
still be of benefit to the public, as they will have gone to improve a
district owned building. In the future, whether the building is used by
the public school system, a public charter school, or a District
government agency doesn’t really matter so long as the building stays
in the public inventory to be used by the citizens of the District of
Columbia in whatever is the most appropriate public use at the time that
is compatible with the needs and desires of the neighborhood in which it
is located.
###############
How to Tell Who’s on First
Justin Swain, robert2130@att.net
[Re: Who’s on First?, Joan Eisenstodt, themail, April 19] What
addresses to use when reporting incidents occurring in alleys? As a
member of the DCMP, when this question was discussed at a winter ANC
meeting with Dupont Circle residents and business owners the best
response was:
Occupants or managers of buildings where the rear of the building or
property also faces an alley can assist crime reporting by placing a
sign on the back of the building or structure behind the building
closest to and facing the alley. The sign should easily readable in the
alley. The sign needs to display the building number and street name of
the front of the building.
To assist neighbors in reporting incidents, residents or tenants or
property managers should create a sketch of the alley with the street
names and building numbers included. Distribute the sketch or map of the
alley to occupants of the affected buildings. The goal is to have this
reliable and convenient reference near the phone for reporting events
with in an alley. If one needs to report an incident while in an alley,
the alley facing sign will assist your cell-phone call for police
assistance. Solutions to reoccurring problems may require proactive
citizen action.
###############
Lead, follow, or get out of the way. That may be the recommendation
in the September 12 Democratic Primary election for a certain at-large
council member from Ward 3 heading up the District of Columbia Council
Committee on the Judiciary. Can we do better in 2006? I read with
interest, utter shock, and at times comic relief at some of the E-mail
articles that were posted on themail in support of the DC Council’s
Judiciary Committee Chairman’s lackadaisical approach to legislating
and in responding to the public’s overwhelming concern in reducing
crime in the nation’s capital. The distinguished at large council
member’s attempts to deliberately refuse a timely review of and public
hearing for the Omnibus Public Safety Act of 2005, Bill 16-247 (see the
bill and summary at http://www.dcwatch.com/council16/16-247.htm#Summary)
are incredulous and border on irresponsibility and are almost scandalous
in his seeming disdain and concern for the people of the District of
Columbia and their need for greater crime enforcement and crime
reduction.
By ignoring the need for a timely pubic hearing, did the at-large
council member from Ward 3 expect that the citizens, police, and
government officials would not notice so that the entire bill would be
allowed to languish in committee? Or does he have some beef with the
mayor who submitted the initial proposal for the Crime Bill in an effort
to give more teeth and bite to the law? Is this what citizens are to
expect in the new millennium, the advanced technological fast paced 21st
Century? We all realize that there is a need for greater crime
prevention, deterrents, and alternatives to crime. We all appreciate and
welcome a comprehensive approach to reducing crime by improving
education, job/workforce training, vocational education,
affordable/workforce housing, youth/recreation programs, accessible drug
treatment, affordable and accessible healthcare, and the like. This is a
must.
We want to show some compassion when we can, but we cannot spend all
of our time being sad about the chronic offender’s childhood horrors
when everyday citizens — regardless of race, creed, color, gender,
ethnicity, nationality, persuasion, or social class — are being
terrorized just blocks or inches from police stations, The White House,
the Capitol, the Monument, Freedom Plaza, the grocery store, their
homes, even ballet schools in Ward 4. But sometimes you just need to put
a hurting on the incorrigible criminals that do not value life, limb, or
property of others or themselves. We have to get serious about crime and
lock a few recidivists, male and female, up. Lead, follow, or get out of
the way.
Or just maybe the two-term elected official has his head buried in
the sand and has lost touch with the city’s electorate that is crying
for sincere and effective leadership, good government, and reform?
Perhaps the Judiciary Committee chair should turn on the news or read
the newspaper to see the incredible and horrific crimes committed on his
watch as citizens beg for relief and the police plea for additional
resources to do their job effectively. Today’s criminal is even
shooting at cops, using armor piercing bullets, striking grandmothers
and grandmothers, attacking kids, and committing crimes in broad
daylight. Is this the time for the Council to drag its feet on major
legislation and give criminals a free ride and a holiday to do as they
please? But then, isn’t this the same council member that has shirked
his obligation and responsibility to review the Emergency Medical
Services (EMS) after several high profile deaths? What should one expect
then when it comes to more issues under his purview?
There should be a rule against holding up important bills that
conceivably directly impact the citizens’ safety and well being.
However, conversely, these concerned citizens sounded off in the April
20, themail against moving the bill forward for a host of reasons they
felt take over a year to work through. Timeliness and responsible
leadership may no longer be in vogue. It seems like it would be
difficult for elected officials to maintain the public trust and build
bridges between the government and the community. By forfeiting a timely
review of the proposed legislation and holding a public hearing, is a
subtle message being sent to the dedicated cops that give their lives to
fight violence and greed and try to solve crimes to reduce the rate of
homicide and theft of property that government does not care? Is this
the way to show District citizens that the administration cares about
all the citizens in all eight wards in the District? Can we afford this
type of leadership that procrastinates on getting bills before the
public or perhaps just doesn’t know how to do his job as well as his
predecessors?
Surely it is time for some elected officials to move on if they
unable to see that some communities are under siege with crime and are
desperate for reasonable measures and take action. How many killings,
rapes, carjackings, burglaries, and thefts must go on before the
leadership makes things happen and champions public safety for the
people? To be sure, in some neighborhoods fighting and solving crime do
matter. Maybe there will be a coup or mutiny on the Judiciary Committee
to get the bill before the community so that DC residents can weigh in.
On the job training for this Committee Chair with such awesome
responsibility obviously isn’t working and he needs to be replaced as
its head. This is no time for procrastination and shyness toward duty.
I don’t support mandatory sentences and some of the other aspects
of the bill, but the citizens deserve an opportunity to comment on the
proposal right now. Advisory Neighborhood Commissioners, the DC
Federation of Civic Associations, DC Federation of Citizens
Associations, ANC Assembly, PTAs, individual civic association leaders,
police support groups, and union, business, faith community, youth, and
education leaders need demand that this bill be brought to life. Instead
of DC’s spending a lot of time figuring out ways to drive churches out
of communities because of parking, let’s be more ambitious in finding
the wherewithal to drive crime out of the Metropolitan Washington area
and give the people a break.
As I said in a previous article I submitted to themail, it’s not
about race and class in the 2006 elections, but about qualifications,
leadership, competence, and the ability to connect with people and
"get it done." A. Scott Bolden, candidate for at-large DC
council, had it right in his comments. A relatively young voter in Ward
7, I am beginning to agree with that assessment. We cannot spend all of
our time being compassionate about the chronic offender’s childhood
horrors when everyday citizens regardless of race, gender, ethnicity,
persuasion, or social class are being terrorized just blocks from such
places as police stations, The White House, the Capitol, the Monument,
Freedom Plaza, the grocery store, and their homes. We have to get
serious about crime and lock a few recidivists up. Do you hear
footsteps, Mr. Judiciary Committee chair? Lead, follow, or get out of
the way, councilmember. Can’t we do better? Get it done.
###############
Expect a Sea of Change in
2006
Kathryn A. Pearson-West, wkpw3@aol.com
The political landscape in the District of Columbia is about to
change tremendously and the voters seem to be ready and eager for it.
That’s a good thing, a good sign for progress and accountability. Had
the sponsors of the citizens’ term limits initiative envisioned an
election like long ago, they may not have felt the need to impose term
limits and incite the council to revoke the passed initiative. This
year, there seem to be self imposed term limits, though one or two
elected officials may need a little hint to go on primary election day.
New blood is a given in the mayor’s and council chair’s positions
this year as well as for the council seats in Wards 3, 5, and 6 because
some of the elected officials are seeking reelection and one is
retiring. It is a likely possibility that one two term incumbent might
tumble in one of this year’s races if the current momentum is any
indication and the leadership void continues. If qualifications and
ability rule, then the incumbent is destined to be replaced
overwhelmingly. There will be an at-large council seat on the ballot in
September. There is also a council member up for reelection in Ward 1.
And in November, the president of the school board and the District 3
representative will not be on the ballot. There will be a sea of change
in 2006.
Candidate forums, increasingly held by the ward Democratic
organizations, are sparking interest in the very viable candidates.
Also, the proliferation of candidates’ posters in well manicured yards
and in windows throughout the city makes the various elections even more
dynamic and inspiring. There have been quite a few forums held for the
mayor’s position, but few for the Chairman’s race and the at large
race. The Cleveland Park Civic Association and the Ward 8 Democrats
jumped at the opportunity early to sponsor elections for that position.
Kalorama Citizens Association and the Ward 8 Dems took on the at-large
council races leading the way in the forum industry.
Recently the Ward 3 and Ward 4 Democratic Committees (Robert Brandon
and Dwayne Toliver, chairpersons, respectively) joined together to
sponsor a candidates’ forum at Wilson Senior High School (home of the
Tigers and where my son graduated) in Ward 3. This forum was for both
council chair and at-large council candidates. The turnout was not as
large as one may have imagined, but it was a good venue to get a good
look at the candidates. My reason for traveling from Ward 5 to the forum
was not just to support a particular candidate or to learn more about
their vision and abilities. Nor was it to experience the nostalgia of
once going to PTA meetings at Wilson. I was also there to see whether
the much heralded discussion in DC Watch’s themail and in the
community about race and class in the election would be an obvious
factoring the debate. The jury may be still out on that. If you live in
a ward where your candidate is running for office, you expect some of
the voters to come out to cheer them on or to at least establish a
presence in their favor. But people came from throughout the city and
the audience was quite diverse. Blacks cheered for whites, whites
cheered for blacks, and some kept poker faces.
No matter who clapped for whom, the presentations by the candidates
were intriguing. Over the years I have observed councilmember Kathy
Patterson to be a responsible and hardworking legislator, always doing
her homework and very thorough. However, this was the first time I had
seen councilmember Vincent Gray in a forum, and I must admit I was
impressed and found his answers to be sensible and him very intelligent
and resourceful. These are two strong candidates and it may have to
result in the toss of a coin to pick one of the two exceptional leaders.
It will be interesting to see how many votes each candidate gets from
their ward. Will it be a test of wards and geography — east of the
river vs. west of the park — or will it be about who can best serve in
the position?
No one is talking about male versus female in the race for chair and
that shows how far DC and the sexes have come. The question becomes who
can work best with the other council members and keep the peace and be a
consensus builder? Gray and Patterson may be equally matched on ability
and experience in the city, but which one can best pull the city
together and move the council and the people’s agenda best? Also, in
the event that the mayor is unable to serve, which would you prefer to
take the mayor’s place in his/her absence? Isn’t the council chair
the second in command if something happens to the mayor? Who would be
able to best represent the city and meet the needs of all the citizens?
Good questions to consider when voting one’s conscience.
The at-large race is a different animal. Running against the two-term
Democrat is an energetic, articulate, knowledgeable Democratic
challenger and mover and shaker in the District of Columbia that makes
things happen. At the forum, I found A. Scott Bolden to be brilliant,
sensitive to the needs of diverse groups, and charming, with leadership
skills written all over him. He didn’t appear to be weak or shy like
some I’ve seen and was strong. He was quite confident and able.
Perception is reality. He was on top of the issues and was not
intimidated by his surroundings like some candidates tend to be as they
go from ward to ward, community to community. He didn’t wince at
controversial issues and explained his positions whenever there was any
doubt. He was not flawless, but he showed that he is an exceptional
candidate and leader. He was probably too gentle that evening.
This should have been the time for Bolden to hammer away at the need
for improved oversight with the Emergency Medical Services. This was the
time to lash out about why the crime bill was stuck in the Judiciary
Committee for over a year as if the residents of the District of
Columbia were not mature enough to judge the merits and
constitutionality of it themselves. This was the time to make an issue
of allowing a bill to languish in committee while people are dying in
the streets from crime. This was the time to call for action and let the
residents see what’s on the table in the bill. This was the time to
ask the incumbent whether he was able. This was the time to ask whether
the incumbent was cognizant of the fact that there are too many killings
and carjackings in the paper and that the people could use a little
relief from the carnage and violence. This was the time to ask what
Emancipation Day means to the incumbent and why he voted against it
repeatedly.
The Ward 3/Ward 4 forum was a good one and the ward Democratic
organizations are planning a joint forum for the mayoral candidates in
May. Ward 5 Dems plan to sponsor one for at large and chair in May. This
forum was moderated by the illustrious Colbert King, Deputy Chief,
Editorial Page, The Washington Post. The panelists that
questioned the candidates consisted of Dorothy Brizill, DCWatch, and
Kathryn Sinzinger, The Common Denominator. Both presented very
fair and interesting questions. They did not appear to be partial to any
candidate or any ward. The audience also got to submit questions on
cards. Too bad there was no one there to promote the University of the
District of Columbia in these discussions.
I am looking forward to the months ahead as the campaigning continues
and residents get to meet and greet the candidates. I am looking forward
to going ward to ward to see how the candidates do in different venues
and monitor whether their positions change. Instead of race or class,
the election may be more about power. Which wards will turn out voters
and claim the victory with their overwhelming turnout? Which ward will
be able to claim the ability to be King or Queen maker, regardless of
race, creed, color, gender, and so forth? Who will call the shots in
this year’s election? The number of residents in each ward is fairly
equal. Who will get their voters out? Will there be a surprise in the
turnout? Will Ward 8 show that it is equal in political strength and
interest to Ward 3? Will east of the river coalesce with west of the
park to support the same candidate? Whatever the verdict, we at least
know that A. Scott Bolden will be everywhere in this city making his
case for the citizens’ votes and to share a collective vision of the
city. He will be there working with everyday people to help shape the
city. That is what I am learning from these forums. The message is
clear. Leadership and ability are everything.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — EVENTS
DCPS Community Meeting on Facilities Master
Plan, April 24 and following
Roxanne Evans, roxanne.evans@k12.dc.us
The District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS) will host a second
round of community forums beginning Monday, April 24, to review
highlights of the data and findings that have been assembled for the
district’s new Facilities Master Plan. Six sessions are planned,
including one covering DCPS high schools, one for middle and junior high
schools, and four for elementary schools. During the first round of
meetings with the public, which ran from March 29 through April 6, DCPS
received input from community members on potential plans for school
consolidations and modernizations. The sessions also explored the future
use of buildings that will no longer be used by DCPS for traditional
K-12 enrollment. For the first time, DCPS introduced the use of an
automated, interactive polling process that allowed for real-time
recording and tabulating of responses to several facilities-related
questions and issues. The technology enabled every community member
present to have the opportunity to share views and opinions.
In the next series of meetings, DCPS facilities staff and consultants
will review data collected to date, along with findings regarding the
conditions of school buildings and the proposed restructuring of the
district’s 16.2-million-square-foot building inventory.
Recommendations on the use of facilities, which are now being developed
in response to the requirements of the Master Education Plan released
earlier this year, will be presented by Superintendent Janey to the
Board of Education. A final plan will be submitted for review and
approval by the board.
All meetings will be held from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. Elementary school
meetings, by planning area: Monday, April 24, Randle Highlands
Elementary School (Areas B & C); Tuesday, April 25, Cleveland
Elementary School (Areas F & G); Wednesday, April 26, Ludlow-Taylor
Elementary School (Areas A & D); Thursday, April 27, Takoma
Elementary School (Areas E & H). Middle schools meeting,
district-wide: Wednesday, May 3, Backus Middle School. High schools
meeting, district-wide: Thursday, May 4, Ballou High School.
###############
Ward 5 Council Candidates Forum, April 24
Hazel Thomas, thomashazelb@aol.com
The Ward 5 Democrats organization will host a Ward 5 council
candidates forum on Monday, April 24, from 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. at Bertie
Backus Middle School, 5100 South Dakota Avenue, NE. Backus School is
located on South Dakota Avenue between Hamilton and Galloway Streets
near the Ft. Totten Metro Station. The program will begin with a brief
business meeting and conclude with announcements about upcoming economic
development and community projects; however, the focus of the meeting
will be the Ward 5 Council candidates forum. The Forum is planned to
give Ward 5 residents an opportunity to review the key platform issues
of all the candidates competing for the Ward 5 City Council seat.
Critical topics to be addressed include: housing, economic development,
employment, public safety issues, youth, family, seniors and retiree
issues. Each of the candidates will have two minutes to give an opening
statement, followed by questions from a media panel, and questions from
the audience. The forum will conclude with a closing statement from each
candidate.
As of April 19, the persons who have filed their candidacy for Ward 5
Council seat with the DC Board of Elections or the Office of Campaign
Finance are: Joe Harris, III, Regina James, Ron Magnus, Bruce Marshall,
Miriam Moore, Audrey Ray, Steve Rynecki, Debbie Smith, Carolyn Steptoe,
Harry Thomas, Jr., Frank Wilds, Vera Winfield, and Raenelle Zapata.
This is the second in a series of candidate forums hosted by Ward 5
Democrats. On March 27, the organization hosted an audience of 300 at
Israel Baptist Church to presentations from the five primary candidates
running for mayor. On May 22, the organization will present candidates
vying for the At-Large and Council Chairman seats at McKinley Technology
School, 4th and T Streets, NE (near the New York –Florida
Avenues METRO station, just north of the FEDX office. For more
information about the Ward 5 Democrats’ Mayoral Forum, contact Anita
Bonds, Chair of the Ward 5 Democrats at 492-1199, or Hazel Bland Thomas,
Press Officer, at 491-4295.
###############
The Fairfax County Public Library invites you to a free event on
Tuesday, April 25 at 7:30 p.m. at the McLean Community Center. Colonel
Matthew Bogdanos will discuss leading the mission to recover antiquities
stolen from the Iraq National Museum after the fall of Baghdad in 2003.
Bogdanos will sign copies of his book, Thieves of Baghdad: One Marine’s
Passion for Ancient Civilizations and the Journey to Recover the World’s
Greatest Stolen Treasures, which will also be on sale. Bogdanos’
royalties will be donated to the Iraq National Museum. For event
details, go to http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/library.
###############
DC Mayor and Politics at Woman’s National
Democratic Club, April 27
Pat Bitondo, pbitondo@aol.com
On Thursday, April 27, the Woman’s National Democratic Club will
hold a panel speaker luncheon on "DC Mayors and Politics, Past,
Present and Future." Jonetta Rose Barras, radio partner of Kojo
Nnamdi, is currently a political analyst for NPR affiliate, WAMU-FM
radio. She is nationally known for authoring two recent books. Dorothy
Brizill is the Executive Director of DC Watch, the on-line newspaper
that covers local social and political trends. Terry Lynch is the
Executive Director of the Downtown Cluster of Congregations. All three
panelists are perfectly situated to explain the labyrinthine world of
mayoral politics and what is going on in this fast-changing city of
ours. Woman’s National Democratic Club, 1536 New Hampshire Avenue, NW.
$25 for nonmembers, $20 for members. For reservations, contact pfitzgerald@democraticwoman.org
or telephone 232-7363. Bar opens at 11:30 a.m. Lunch is served at 12:30
p.m.
###############
Greatest Mexican Muralists, April 29
Barbara Ruesga-Pelayo, bruesga@sre.gob.mx
The Cultural Institute of Mexico will sponsor an all-day seminar on
the Greatest Mexican Muralists on Saturday April 29, 9:30 a.m. to 4:00
p.m. at the Cultural Institute of Mexico, 2829 16th Street, NW. In
cooperation with the Smithsonian Associates and Smithsonian Latino
Center. Reservations: 633-1240, fax 786-2477. Tickets: general admission
$141, RAP and CIM Members $95, Senior Members $86. Gregorio Luke,
director of the Museum of Latin American Art in Los Angeles, shares his
passion for Mexican murals. Luke has lectured extensively on Mexican art
in museums and universities in Mexico, Europe, and the United States.
Life-size images bring to life the artworks of Mexican muralists Diego
Rivera, José Clemente Orozco, and David Alfaro Siqueiros. Including a
Mexican breakfast and lunch.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to
switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the
subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm.
To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com
with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages
are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.