Lightning Strikes Again
Dear Lightning Rods:
There are just two more issues of themail before the general
election, so you need to hurry if you want to support your candidate or
cause. If you don't raise the flag, how do you expect others to salute
it? I also want to point you to one additional posting, a reply by the
Apartment and Office Building Association to Debby Hanrahan's message in
themail a week ago. The reply is so long it doesn't begin to fit in this
issue, so I've put it on the web site as a supplement: http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/2002/02-10-27b.htm.
Gary Imhoff
themail@dcwatch.com
###############
Ed T. Barron’s Mixed Emotions
Mark L. Sibley, markdc@starpower.net
Trouble deciding for whom to vote? If you are really undecided,
something I would find surprising for most readers of themail, I would
ask you a few questions: 1) Do you want a mayor who is obsessed with his
own self-promotion and self-image rather than someone who sincerely
cares about making the city the best place it can be? 2) Do you want a
Mayor who would purposely deceive you in order to make himself look
better than other candidates? Do you really want someone who quit his
job as CFO in order to run for the office and then said at forums around
the city that his wife had to be the breadwinner for the family since he
had no income, which was a hardship he was willing to bear in order to
serve you? Do you want a Mayor who while claiming this high moral ground
was secretly receiving $30,000 from Arthur Anderson Company and other
monies from NationsBank and illegally not reporting it?
3) Do you want a Mayor whose office, under the guise that money was
needed for children's programs, pressured District businesses and others
who held contracts with his government to give over a million dollars to
non-profits the Mayor had set up and controlled and then took this money
and used it to fund parties and events to enhance the Mayor’s image?
4) Do you want a Mayor who, when agencies aren’t performing as
promised, lowers the standards to make it look as if things are
improving? 5) Do you want a Mayor who, wanting to impress everyone,
demanded that his campaign turn in 10,000 signatures to get his name on
the ballot, only when he fell about 8,765 signatures short, turned in
thousands upon thousands of forgeries and signatures gathered through
illegal means? Do you want a Mayor who, while he may not have been
personally involved with the initial forgeries, spent over $300,000 in
legal fees trying to defend them and benefit from the fraud, and when it
was decided that he would not be able to benefit from the illegal
activity referred to the decision as “lawless”?
If so, Anthony Williams should be your choice for mayor.
###############
Another Vote Against Williams
Clyde Howard, ceohoward@hotmail.com
If you tried to make a fast buck by using the various and sundry
methods of the Mayor and those around him, you would find yourself knee
deep in a court of law trying to stay out of jail. Who says that
politics don't pay? What amazes me is that those who are obligated to
hold up the law can call themselves attorneys for the people. If I
didn't know any better it would appear that the Mafia is still in
business buying friends and influencing those in the legal community to
stay out of trouble — a deal they could not refuse. Will we ever see
an honest administration that will work for the people and uphold the
integrity of the office of Mayor? Must we continue to be the yum yum
tree for all to pluck the berries of wealth for themselves and friends?
Will we ever have the opportunity as a population to turn down the pork
barrels that seem to reward the movers and shakers of back room deals
for the city? This election is a prime example of how we as citizens
allow the corruption of the city to continue, because we vote blindly
for a Democratic slate without giving any thought to the consequences of
our past vote that put a person in the Mayor's office who does not have
the interest of the general population at heart. Take a look at what is
happening with the projects around the city and ask yourselves the
question, “What has happened to the people who use to live there?”
You can bet your sweet bippy they are not living in the nice beautiful
town houses that have replaced their former homes. This Mayor has no
conscience about displacing us to make way for the elite and well to do.
He is hell bent to make over this city to the liking of the powerful and
mighty.
My advise to those who want to vote for the one person that has
brought no meaningful change to his or her neighborhood and is seeking a
second term, please vote instead for the person that is for the common
folks and not for the elite and well-to-do.
###############
Where’s the Beef?
Ed T. Barron, edtb@aoldotcom
Carol Schwartz and Tony Williams went face-to-face in a debate
arranged by American and Howard Universities and broadcast on PBS this
past Wednesday. Carol cleaned Tony Williams' clock in the debate,
especially when it came to the deal Williams tried to push through with
Doug Jemal paying $12M for property worth about half that amount. The
most interesting comment from Mayor Williams was his description of the
vision that he has for DC. His vision is that all DC children should get
a good education in the DC public schools. That is a great vision since
a viable education of DC kids will ultimately, over the long term, solve
most of the District's major problems — poverty, joblessness, and
street crime. Unfortunately Williams' vision is just that, a dream. To
make that dream a reality you have to add the beef.
The only way to make a dream come true is to back that dream up with
solid near term and long term plans. Behind that vision there must be a
realistic mission statement. Then to accomplish the mission there must
be a series of time-oriented measurable goals. When the mission
statement and goals for the top level of the DC government are in place,
cross-functional teams comprised of persons from lower level
organizations, who will really make things happen, must be formed. Each
of these teams will tackle one or more of the top level goals and have
their own mission statement and supporting goals. This is not rocket
science. It is a proven process that works. When all the lower level
goals are met and the cross functional teams accomplish their mission,
then the top level goals will be met. When all the top level goals are
met, the top level mission is accomplished and the vision/dream will be
realized. Accomplishing the Williams' vision will take years of
dedicated effort, but the results will justify the cost. Add the beef,
Tony.
###############
Democrats for Carol Schwartz
Robert Andrew Fason, ccadadc@aol.com
We would like to thank the more than two hundred District of Columbia
Democrats registering to support Councilmember Carol Schwartz for Mayor.
While many of us support the November Democratic Team except for Mayor
Tony Williams, we believe Carol is bigger than politics, and her
election would force the conservative DC Democratic State Committee,
controlled by Northern Virginia corporations and developers, to become
more progressive on issues of concern to DC Democrats such as education,
affordable health care, reducing youth crime, and ending the push out of
longtime District residents out of our city. These are issues that Carol
has been aggressive and progressive on. If you are a DC Democrat and
believe Carol Schwartz should be our next Mayor, volunteer by joining
Democrats for Schwartz for Mayor. Isn't it time for integrity?
###############
New Reports on DC’s Financial Situation as National Capital
Mark David Richards, Dupont East, mark@bisconti.com
The Brookings Institution released a new report supporting the
argument that the federal government imposes costs on DC for which it
should compensate. Here is their abstract of “A Sound Fiscal Footing
for the Nation's Capital: A Federal Responsibility:” “Great nations
support great capital cities, but the United States has neglected
Washington, DC. This paper, co-authored by Carol O'Cleireacain and Alice
M. Rivlin, proposes that the federal government support the District of
Columbia by making a predictable annual contribution to the city's
budget. The paper examines the arguments for such a payment, including
the fiscal handicaps imposed on the District by its capital-city status
and the fact that it is a city without a state. It explores alternative
forms the contribution might take and ways taxpayers can be assured the
money is well spent without impairing the ability of District citizens
to govern themselves.” Here is a link to the full report: http://www.brook.edu/dybdocroot/es/urban/gwrp/DCgovernance.htm.
The report adds important information to the discussion. For example,
it states that “The budget for elementary and secondary education
further illustrates the problem of 'statelessness.' The District is a
unified school district, responsible for a public education system,
without the state help typically available to big-city school districts.
By average national norms, the absence of state aid, conservatively
estimated, costs the District's schools between $200 and $285 million
annually. Meanwhile, both Maryland and Virginia provide their school
districts with substantial state aid that varies with the wealth of the
district. The Baltimore City School District, for example, relies much
more heavily on the State of Maryland and the federal government for its
resources than do the richer Maryland suburbs. In FY2001, Baltimore's
schools received 59 percent of their operating fund revenue from the
state and 15 percent from the federal government. In stark contrast,
Washington, DC, without a state to support its school district, relies
on local taxpayers for more than three-quarters of its public school
resources, compared to Baltimore's local tax support of only 24 percent.
The difference between Baltimore's local share and Washington's amounted
to $340 million to the District in FY2001.”
The report also points out that the District provides 88 percent of
the total local government support to Metro, and, since DC has two of
six votes on the WMATA governing board, “it is unlikely that the
District can win any change in the formula to redistribute this
excessive burden without the help of the federal government.” The
Washington Times published an editorial on Oct. 26, http://www.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20021026-94732417.htm
arguing that, “A new economic-policy relationship with the federal
government is certainly in order. The federal government is a burden —
a welcome burden, but a burden nonetheless -- on the city when it does
not pay its fair share.” A Government Accounting Office (GAO) report
released last month argued that DC benefits from the federal presence,
it does have state-like types of revenues, and it believes there could
be cost savings through management efficiencies, by reassessing current
policies, and by restructuring key programs. It cited a 2002 McKinsey
& Company, Inc. study would concluded that DC could achieve about
$110 to $160 in cost savings in the areas of health, human services,
education, and transportation. GAO concluded that “Presently,
insufficient data or analysis exist to discern whether or to what extent
the District is, in fact, facing a fiscal structural imbalance. . . .
Congress would benefit from more systematic information . . . We
currently have ongoing work in this area and plan to issue a future
report with a more comprehensive analysis. . . .”
###############
While I like the idea of a locally elected District Attorney, I wish
that the election for that office were nonpartisan, like the Board of
Education and Advisory Neighborhood Commission elections, rather than
partisan like the Mayor, Council, Delegate, and shadow Senators and
Representative elections.
Is justice partisan, with a Democratic District Attorney giving the
unions a free pass, while a Republican DA would let corporate evildoers
off with a slap on the wrist? Could a partisan DA be truly independent
in the face of a partisan censure? I would hope that the office would be
nonpartisan, perhaps with a first round of voting during the party
primaries, and a final round in November between the two leading
candidates, if no one had received a majority.
###############
[Gary Imhoff] wrote, “Advocates of Advisory Referendum A, which
calls for a local elected District Attorney, are basing their argument
entirely on local pride and home rule.” I (and, by extension, my
InTowner newspaper) am one of a large number of advocates for Referendum
A, yet I bypassed the “local pride and home rule” pitch instead to
stress the following notion in the editorial that appears at page 3 of
my October issue:
“We need a prosecutor's office that will cover the entire range of
law enforcement. . . . We need an office that will give attention to
municipal corruption, nonprofit institutions and their proper charitable
responsibilities, consumer protection, and lots more. We have virtually
none of those issues assigned for in-depth attention under the present
system; the US Attorney's Office is just too focused on its traditional
federal responsibilities. . . .”
###############
Arthur H. Jackson, Chairman of Empower the People and a potential
candidate for Mayor in 2004 has announced his support of Referendum A,
which would establish an elected District Attorney for the District of
Columbia. Jackson. a former Maryland Councilman released the following
statement, "We cannot depend on the corrupt and sold out Williams
Administration to challenge corruption and influence buying, when this
is the very root of its reelection funding source. Our city has been
sold out to any wealthy contractor or real estate developer with a fat
check book, willing to donate to the Mayor's campaign.
“An elected District Attorney, which will be independent and
committed to prosecuting white collar criminals in our city government
using their positions for personal gains or profits, contractors buying
access to contracts, and Mayors violating city laws. A vote for
Referendum A would help clean up a city government full of fraud, abuse,
and influence panhandling. Which can only end when the 60 percent of the
city voters who did not vote on September 10, get out and vote out the
present Mayor and his political cronies.”
On November 5, 2002 let's restore integrity and accountability to DC
Government. Vote yes on Referendum A and no to reelecting Mayor Tony
Williams.
###############
More Master Business License Questions
Lorraine Swerdloff, swerdloffs@erols.com
I have a full-time job, but recently started doing some freelance web
and graphic design work at my home in the District for which I could
earn more than $2,000 this year. Do I need to obtain the new Master
Business License and along with that go through the Home Occupancy
Permit procedure? Anything else?
[The answer is that, as the law stands, you do have to get the Master
Business License and Home Occupancy Permit. The Master Business License
itself isn't about raising money, since the cost of the license will
barely cover the cost of issuing it. But the MBL will give the city
expansive new power to regulate and control many activities that the
government has no rational reason, and otherwise has no excuse, to
regulate. You will have to get a city license and permit to be a graphic
designer, or a sculptor, or a writer, or to mow lawns or deliver
newspapers or rent out your English basement. In June, the City Council
very quietly passed emergency legislation to exempt churches from the
bill (and last week held a hearing to make the exemption for churches
permanent), but the rest of us don't have the political influence to get
ourselves out from under this law's oppressive reach. — Gary Imhoff]
###############
Commemorative Quarter Dollar for DC in 2009
Mark David Richards, Dupont East, mark@bisconti.com
HR 4005 — To provide for a circulating quarter dollar coin program
to commemorate the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the United States Virgin Islands, and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and for other purposes —
was received in the Senate on October 8. The bill requires that each of
the six designs be selected by the Secretary of the Treasury after
consultation with “the chief executive of the District of Columbia or
the territory being commemorated, or such other officials or group as
the chief executive officer of the District of Columbia or the territory
may designate for such purpose; and the Commission of Fine Arts.” The
bill stipulates that, “Because it is important that the Nation's
coinage and currency bear dignified designs of which the citizens of the
United States can be proud, the Secretary shall not select any frivolous
or inappropriate design for any quarter dollar minted under this
subsection" and "No head and shoulders portrait or bust of any
person, living or dead, and no portrait of a living person may be
included in the design of any quarter dollar under this subsection.”
John McCaslin, the Washington Times Inside the Beltway
columnist, invited readers to submit ideas, published on Oct. 23 and 24.
Following are some of the suggestions: “Politician sticking up a
taxpayer,” “Georgetown manhole cover,” “A turkey,” “Two
laughing politicians shoveling piles of money off a cliff,” “The US
Capitol, and in the foreground — clearly discernible — pigs lounging
by a trough,” “A giant vacuum sucking cash and coin across the
land,” “A jail cell,” “The Washington Monument sinking into a
pothole,” “A pig nursing its dependent young,” “A large hot-air
balloon,” “Donkey on the tail side, elephant on the head side,”
“A toilet with a stream of dollars flowing into it,” “A traffic
camera,” “A parking meter,” “A parking ticket,” “Tow truck
and Denver boot,” “A huge traffic jam,” “A regular quarter cut
in half and worth only 12 cents, to represent the government taking our
self-determined share of our money.”
###############
Tax Exempt Municipal Bonds, Open Letter to
Phil Mendelson
Sol Shalit, sss.sol@gte.net
Dear Phil: As Board member of the Foggy Bottom Association and as one
who has been writing and testifying on District issues, I was quite
surprised to learn that you — of all Councilmembers — were a strong
supporter of lifting the Tax Exemption on non-District municipals. Your
comparisons with other municipalities is misguided and irrelevant since
the District finances are unique — and not for the better. This is not
the place to get into details, but it is a terribly bad idea for a
number of reasons, the most important of which are that this hurts
middle class residents, all retirees, and encourages (not immediately,
though) migration out of the District. The haste with which this was
passed — unsurprising when (deceptively) flying under the banner of
“sock the rich” — does not inspire much confidence. While it may
seem a good way of raising money quickly with few political
consequences, it is actually a very bad idea which the Council would
live to regret. Most people are not even aware of it, and when they do
learn of it you can expect a groundswell of outrage.
I urge you to do the utmost to reinstate the exemption in the
interest of the District, and not lend your hand to render it even more
unattractive to taxpayers by adding yet another impediment.
###############
Bikes in themail
Kirsten Sherk, U Street NW, swerdloffs@erols.com
As a bicycling commuter, I feel compelled to respond to Mr. Berry's
post, but only sort of. Maybe I'm naive, but I think we'd be a lot less
suicidal if we felt like there was actually a place for us on the road.
When I ride those few streets with a bike lane, I stay in that lane.
When I'm faced with roads without bike lanes, where traffic doesn't
allow me to fit in, I'm more likely to dodge in and out of traffic. So
my answer is more bike lines! And also, watch that passenger side when
you turn right. Even if you were on a street with a bike lane, that bike
would still be passing you on the right.
Now, my gripe: several weeks ago, I was riding home from Whole Foods
up 15th Street, NW, between P and U. Big street which is pretty quiet on
weekends. As I'm biking up with grocery bags on my handle bars, a patrol
car pulls up next to me. I assumed that he was going to rightfully bust
me for my dangerous portage style. Au contraire! He told me that I was
“riding too far over in the lane,” and blocking traffic. I was
riding smack in the center of the far lane so cars would see me and not
hit me. There was no parking lane and no bike lane. Furthermore, it's
not against the law. I told him so too, but he didn't believe me. After
harassing me for several minutes he declined to give me a traffic ticket
and drove off. I left a message with our local district headquarters, so
maybe someone's set him straight by now, but it really burned my buttons
that the cops don't even know what the laws are regarding bikes. (By the
way, I have since acquired paniers to carry my groceries in!)
###############
I Hope Someone Else is Asking These Questions
David Sobelsohn, dsobelsoatcapaccessdotorg
I'm a lifelong opponent of the death penalty. But these snipers got
me to reconsider. They're about as evil and dangerous as humans can get.
We're well rid of them. Execution's too good for them.
Then I starting thinking. Since the September murder in Montgomery,
Alabama, law-enforcement officials have had a fingerprint, and the
fingerprint has been in the INS electronic database. That's how the
murderers were caught. But why did it take a tip from one of the
murderers himself before law-enforcement officials ran a check on the
Alabama fingerprint? There was already an unsolved murder in Montgomery.
They already had a fingerprint. What were the folks in Alabama waiting
for? If they'd checked the fingerprint soon after the Montgomery murder,
could they have caught these men at the beginning of October and
prevented the DC-area murders? Perhaps Alabama will claim limited
law-enforcement resources delayed their investigation. But if that's so,
why is Alabama now eager to spend two million dollars (the average cost
according to several studies) to execute these murderers instead of
locking them up for life without parole and using that money to help
prevent future murders? Clearly, the prospect of the death penalty
didn't stop them. Spending the money to track them down after their
first killing might've stopped them.
###############
Lightning Strikes! Again!
Nick Keenan, Shaw, nbk at gsionline.com
Paul Williams wrote last week about how his painful personal
experience is that being hit by lightning is much more likely than most
people believe. Paul should know — in July 2001 he was struck and
nearly killed on his sailboat, and it was the second time he had been
hit. But there is more to the story that even Paul doesn't know. I sold
the boat to Paul, and I have also been hit twice by lightning (mildly
— “shocked” is probably the most accurate way to describe it), and
my second time was on the boat as well. In addition, I had never met
Paul before I sold him the boat, but several days before he was hit he
moved in next door to me. So is it less likely to have two people living
next door to each other, each having been struck twice by lightning, or
to have two people living next door to each other, each having been
struck by lightning on the same boat but in separate incidents? The
chain of coincidence reaches out to each one of you, because Paul bought
the boat through a classified in themail. What are the odds of being a
member of a discussion group that has two members who have each been
struck twice by lightning? Probably better than you think!
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — HELP WANTED
Part-time Secretarial Help Wanted
Sid Booth, SidBooth1@aol.com
Temple Micah, a synagogue located on Wisconsin Avenue between Fulton
and Garfield Streets, NW, is seeking a part-time (15 hours per week)
administrative assistant. Computer knowledge, Word Perfect or Word, a
must. Please fax resume to 342-9179 or E-mail to office@templemicah.org.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — FOR SALE
1996 Chrysler Sebring
Guido Bolanos, guido@email4u.com
Very urgent. In order to help a person in need, it is a must to sell
his car. For anyone interested in buying a Chrysler Sebring 1996
convertible at only $7,500, this could be a chance to help him. This
guy, a respectable journalist in our community, has been diagnosed with
a terminal cancer and is not able to work anymore. Contact guido@email4u.com.
###############
Antique Couch, 1960’s Dining Table and
Chairs
Lynne Mersfelder, Donald.Lewis@starpower.net
Charming antique couch (long and low) light purple velvet; good
condition, fabric on one side is faded, $500. 1965, "mod"
54" round white modern table with six chairs with dark gray
cushions (four side and two armchairs), chairs swivel 360 degrees.
Saarinen Tulip style knockoff with laminate (Formica?) top on white
metal base. I always imagine the Jetsons eating here. Good to very good
condition, $500 or best offer (valued at $800-900). E-mail for more
scoop or if eager, call for details. Can provide digital photos on
request. Call Lynne 257-1730 or E-mail Donald.Lewis@starpower.net.
Can deliver in DC area.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — FREE
Casio Graphics Scientific Calculator
Melissa Booth, meliss9437@aol.com
I have an 8 year old Casio fx 7500G Graphics Scientific Calculator. I
could not get it to turn on, but I checked the batteries and they were
dead. Basically, I would like to give this away to someone who has a use
for a super fancy graphing calculator and can give it a good home. I
also have two manuals for it. Please E-mail Melissa at meliss9437@aol.com.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — DONATIONS
Help us continue the Knitting Program at Bancroft Elementary, a
District of Columbia Public School in Mount Pleasant, as part of the
after school program! This is the fourth year that the Knitting Program
has been sponsored by the Potomac Craftsmens Guild, and the kids love
it. This year teachers from Capital Crocheters and Knitters will be
working with the students in grades 2-5 in the after school program on
Monday afternoons. If you would like to support this program, please
send your tax deductible donation to the Potomac Craftsmens Guild, Inc.,
Attn: Gayle Roehm, Treasurer, 8028 Fenway Road, Bethesda, MD 20817.
###############
Educational Software Needed
Phil Shapiro, pshapiro@his.com
I'm helping a family in Anacostia that has a donated G3 Power Mac
computer. The 9-year-old son in this family, Moses, has been in hospital
a lot the past few years and has fallen far behind in his academics. His
donated computer is his one hope of catching up to his peers. I checked
out the computer yesterday and it is in great working condition. So I'm
on the lookout for donated Macintosh educational software for this child
and his siblings. Moses' mom tells me his math is fairly good, but he
needs a lot of help with reading. If you happen to know any
Macintosh-using families whose children have outgrown their
elementary-level software, I can stop by to pick up the software for
Moses. (I'll drive anywhere in the DC area.) For those of you who might
want to assist in other ways, via “micro-philanthropy,” I'm
accepting small monetary donations via PayPal to buy software for Moses.
PayPal is a free service that lets you send funds via E-mail to anyone
who has an E-mail address. It's possible to transfer even a dollar or
two via PayPal. http://www.paypal.com.
If you do send a small donation, kindly indicate in the subject of your
E-mail: “For Moses.” You can trust me to buy the software for him.
(See http://makeashorterlink.com/?Z13752142).
################
CLASSIFIEDS — CONTEST FOR CHILDREN
Letters about Literature 2003
Patricia Pasqual, changedc@yahoo.com
DC students have a chance to showcase their writing skills and win
prizes by writing a letter to their favorite author. They must explain
how the author's work changed their view of the world or themselves. The
deadline for this year's Letters about Literature is December 7, 2002.
Last year DC students wrote prize winning letters to a wide variety of
authors such as Judy Blume for her still popular It’s Not the End of
the World, and to Sean Covey for his The Seven Habits of Highly
Effective Teens. Prize winning essays came from all across the city
including the School Without Walls, Blessed Sacrament, the National
Presbyterian School and Benjamin Banneker High School. The contest has
three competition levels, each with its own books-change-lives theme:
Level I for young readers in grades 4-6, Level II for young adult
readers in grades 7 and 8, and Level III for readers in grades 9-12.
Letters about Literature is a national project of the Center for the
Book at the Library of Congress and the Weekly Reader Corporation. DC
Center for the Book at the District of Columbia Public Library is the
local sponsor for the contest and has recruited a number of partners to
assist with this effort. Borders Books and Music has been the major
sponsor for the project since 2000 and hosts the awards ceremony. The
Junior League of Washington also provides support and assistance. Awards
will be announced in April 2003. To receive this year’s contest
guidelines and the teacher’s supplement contact Patricia Pasqual,
727-2313, or patricia.pasqual@dc.gov. Or visit the Library of Congress
web site at http://www.loc.gov/cfbook. A list of last year’s local
winners is posted on the DC Center for the Book site, http://www.dclibrary.org/dccb.
###############
CLASSIFIEDS — RECOMMENDATIONS
Looking for a Rummage Sale
Linda Bumbalo, lbumbalo@aol.com
I am looking for a church or school rummage sale to which I can give
clothing, household items, etc. Does anyone know of one occurring in the
next few weeks and when and where one makes donations to it? Thanks.
###############
themail@dcwatch is an E-mail discussion forum that is published every
Wednesday and Sunday. To subscribe, to change E-mail addresses, or to
switch between HTML and plain text versions of themail, use the
subscription form at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail/subscribe.htm.
To unsubscribe, send an E-mail message to themail@dcwatch.com
with “unsubscribe” in the subject line. Archives of past messages
are available at http://www.dcwatch.com/themail.
All postings should also be submitted to themail@dcwatch.com,
and should be about life, government, or politics in the District of
Columbia in one way or another. All postings must be signed in order to
be printed, and messages should be reasonably short — one or two brief
paragraphs would be ideal — so that as many messages as possible can
be put into each mailing.