Logosm.gif (1927 bytes)
navlinks.gif (4688 bytes)
Hruler04.gif (5511 bytes)

Back to DC public schools main page

District of Columbia Public Schools
Report on “Target Assisted” Reform Initiative
Five-Year Performance Profiles
June 2001

Home

Bibliography

Calendar

Columns
Dorothy Brizill
Bonnie Cain
Jim Dougherty
Gary Imhoff
Phil Mendelson
Mark David Richards
Sandra Seegars

DCPSWatch

DCWatch Archives
Council Period 12
Council Period 13
Council Period 14

Election 1998
Election 2000
Election 2002

Elections
Election 2004
Election 2006

Government and People
ANC's
Anacostia Waterfront Corporation
Auditor
Boards and Com
BusRegRefCom
Campaign Finance
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Management Officer
City Council
Congress
Control Board
Corporation Counsel
Courts
DC2000
DC Agenda
Elections and Ethics
Fire Department
FOI Officers
Inspector General
Health
Housing and Community Dev.
Human Services
Legislation
Mayor's Office
Mental Health
Motor Vehicles
Neighborhood Action
National Capital Revitalization Corp.
Planning and Econ. Dev.
Planning, Office of
Police Department
Property Management
Public Advocate
Public Libraries
Public Schools
Public Service Commission
Public Works
Regional Mobility Panel
Sports and Entertainment Com.
Taxi Commission
Telephone Directory
University of DC
Water and Sewer Administration
Youth Rehabilitation Services
Zoning Commission

Issues in DC Politics

Budget issues
DC Flag
DC General, PBC
Gun issues
Health issues
Housing initiatives
Mayor’s mansion
Public Benefit Corporation
Regional Mobility
Reservation 13
Tax Rev Comm
Term limits repeal
Voting rights, statehood
Williams’s Fundraising Scandals

Links

Organizations
Appleseed Center
Cardozo Shaw Neigh.Assoc.
Committee of 100
Fed of Citizens Assocs
League of Women Voters
Parents United
Shaw Coalition

Photos

Search

What Is DCWatch?

themail archives

Report on “Target Assisted” Reform Initiative
Five-Year Performance Profiles

Dr. Paul L. Vance
Chief State School Officer

Prepared by Office of Academic Services
Division of Educational Accountability
June 2001


H.D. Cooke Elementary School

  • The school has made progress in moving students from “below basic” to higher performance categories in reading and mathematics. However, the levels of higher performance yielded in spring 1997 were not maintained in subsequent years.
  • Ranked number 36 among all elementary schools on “Low Performance Index” for SY 1999-2000, which is based on SAT9 performance standards data.

Five-Year Performance Profile

Area

SY 96-97

SY 97-98

SY 98-99

SY 99-00

SY 00-01

READING
Below Basic 26% 24% 20% 19% 20%
Basic 47% 53% 53% 58% 60%
Proficient 23% 20% 22% 21% 18%
Advanced 4% 3% 5% 2% 2%
NCE Mean 45.1 44.4 45.7 45.2 45.8
MATHEMATICS
Below Basic 49% 35% 32% 31% 28%
Basic 29% 41% 53% 52% 50%
Proficient 16% 22% 15% 15% 19%
Advanced 7% 2% 1% 2% 3%
NCE Mean 47.9 44.6 43.0 44.7 47.5
OTHER DATA
Membership 444 441 450 501 494
Attendance Rate 93.9% 94.4% 93.2% 92.6% NA
Suspensions 0 0 0 0 NA

Back to top of page


Davis Elementary School

  • Academic performance for this school has been inconsistent over a five-year period. Percentages of students at the “below basic” level decreased during SY 00-01 for reading and mathematics.
  • Ranked number 19 among all elementary schools on “Low Performance Index” for SY 1999-2000, which is based on SAT9 performance standards data.

Five-Year Performance Profile

Area

SY 96-97

SY 97-98

SY 98-99

SY 99-00

SY 00-01

READING
Below Basic 30% 23% 19% 26% 15%
Basic 52% 48% 55% 51% 51%
Proficient 18% 23% 23% 20% 29%
Advanced 1% 6% 3% 3% 5%
NCE Mean 41.0 47.0 46.8 43.1 48.9
MATHEMATICS
Below Basic 41% 31% 30% 34% 11%
Basic 39% 40% 50% 47% 42%
Proficient 13% 22% 19% 14% 36%
Advanced 7% 7% 2% 5% 11%
NCE Mean 46.7 47.4 45.1 42.9 56.3
OTHER DATA
Membership 516 524 507 479 434
Attendance Rate 91.5% 92.0% 95.7% 97.0% NA
Suspensions 9 0 6 0 NA

Back to top of page


Kramer Middle School

  • Performance for this school has been inconsistent over a five-year period. Although some gains were seen during spring 1998 and 1999, there were declines in spring 2000. Few students performed at the “proficient” and “advanced” levels.
  • Ranked number 1 among all middle/junior high schools on “Low Performance Index” for SY 1999-2000, which is based on SAT9 performance standards data.

Five-Year Performance Profile

Area

SY 96-97

SY 97-98

SY 98-99

SY 99-00

SY 00-01

READING
Below Basic 55% 46% 33% 43% 46%
Basic 43% 47% 54% 47% 46%
Proficient 3% 7% 14% 10% 8%
Advanced 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
NCE Mean 30.5 34.9 38.0 35.5 33.5
MATHEMATICS
Below Basic 92% 85% 74% 86% 86%
Basic 5% 14% 23% 12% 14%
Proficient 0% 2% 3% 1% 1%
Advanced 0% 0% 0% 1% 0%
NCE Mean 26.4 33.5 38.9 34.0 34.8
OTHER DATA
Membership 227 293 284 267 251
Attendance Rate 84.8% 87.1% 88.1% 94.0% NA
Suspensions 19 37 18 5 NA

Back to top of page


LaSalle Elementary School

  • The school has not made consistent improvement in academic performance over a five-year period. Academic performance declined during SY 2000-2001.
  • Ranked number 30 among all elementary schools on “Low Performance Index” for SY 1999-2000, which is based on SAT9 performance standards data.

Five-Year Performance Profile

Area

SY 96-97

SY 97-98

SY 98-99

SY 99-00

SY 00-01

READING
Below Basic 26% 24% 19% 18% 22%
Basic 49% 43% 49% 54% 53%
Proficient 21% 26% 26% 22% 23%
Advanced 4% 7% 6% 6% 2%
NCE Mean 44.4 47.6 48.9 48.0 45.7
MATHEMATICS
Below Basic 40% 37% 36% 34% 35%
Basic 43% 42% 43% 40% 46%
Proficient 14% 18% 18% 21% 17%
Advanced 3% 2% 3% 5% 2%
NCE Mean 45.1 43.7 44.4 46.7 44.2
OTHER DATA
Membership 446 439 389 369 340
Attendance Rate 93.9% 94.7% 95.1% 95.9% NA
Suspensions 0 0 0 0 NA

Back to top of page


Noyes Elementary School

  • Academic performance has been inconsistent over the five-year period, yet there is a general decrease in the percentage of “below basic” students. Mathematics performance has outpaced reading performance.
  • Ranked number 23 among all elementary schools on “Low Performance Index” for SY 1999-2000, which is based on SAT9 performance standards data.

Five-Year Performance Profile

Area

SY 96-97

SY 97-98

SY 98-99

SY 99-00

SY 00-01

READING
Below Basic 36% 19% 30% 29% 30%
Basic 43% 45% 49% 53% 44%
Proficient 20% 32% 18% 17% 23%
Advanced 1% 5% 4% 1% 4%
NCE Mean 40.6 48.6 42.9 42.0 44.9
MATHEMATICS
Below Basic 54% 33% 35% 30% 30%
Basic 37% 41% 41% 46% 46%
Proficient 9% 21% 21% 21% 23%
Advanced 0% 5% 3% 3% 1%
NCE Mean 38.4 45.6 43.7 45.6 45.5
OTHER DATA
Membership 306 319 355 336 325
Attendance Rate 97.0% 94.2% 92.4% 90.8% NA
Suspensions 0 1 0 3 NA

Back to top of page


Phelps Senior High School

  • Reading performance for this school has been inconsistent since spring 1997. Both reading and mathematics profiles declined sharply during 2000-2001.
  • Ranked number 11 among all high schools on “Low Performance Index” for SY 1999-2000, which is based on SAT9 performance standards data.

Five-Year Performance Profile

Area

SY 96-97

SY 97-98

SY 98-99

SY 99-00

SY 00-01

READING
Below Basic 72% 54% 76% 49% 66%
Basic 25% 40% 22% 32% 29%
Proficient 3% 6% 2% 17% 4%
Advanced 0% 1% 1% 2% 1%
NCE Mean 29.9 35.8 27.9 39.7 30.8
MATHEMATICS
Below Basic 100% 96% 93% 67% 90%
Basic 0% 3% 7% 20% 9%
Proficient 0% 1% 0% 11% 2%
Advanced 0% 0% 0% 2% 0%
NCE Mean 27.0 31.6 31.9 45.5 36.0
OTHER DATA
Membership 496 420 403 435 392
Attendance Rate 87.4% 94.4% 94.3% 92.4% NA
Suspensions 27 5 3 6 NA

Back to top of page


Simon Elementary School

  • Academic performance for this school has been poor over the five-year period. Percentages of “below basic” students have been essentially stagnant, and the percentage for “proficient” students remained the same or decreased over time.
  • Ranked number 11 among all elementary schools on “Low Performance Index” for SY 1999-2000, which is based on SAT9 performance standards data.

Five-Year Performance Profile

Area

SY 96-97

SY 97-98

SY 98-99

SY 99-00

SY 00-01

READING
Below Basic 36% 27% 42% 35% 43%
Basic 51% 43% 41% 50% 42%
Proficient 13% 23% 13% 13% 13%
Advanced 1% 6% 4% 2% 1%
NCE Mean 38.2 48.9 38.5 29.2 36.8
MATHEMATICS
Below Basic 30% 37% 48% 34% 35%
Basic 46% 42% 35% 48% 50%
Proficient 23% 20% 14% 17% 13%
Advanced 1% 2% 3% 1% 3%
NCE Mean 47.1 41.1 37.7 41.5 40.5
OTHER DATA
Membership 530 502 491 484 528
Attendance Rate 98.0% 98.1% 96.6% 97.8% NA
Suspensions 0 1 0 30 NA

Back to top of page


R.H. Terrell Junior High School

  • Performance for this school has been inconsistent over a five-year period. It is important to note, however, that the percentages of “below basic” students has decreased substantially since spring 1997 in reading. Mathematics performance remains low.
  • Ranked number 5 among all middle/junior high schools on “Low Performance Index” for SY 1999-2000, which is based on SAT9 performance standards data.

Five-Year Performance Profile

Area

SY 96-97

SY 97-98

SY 98-99

SY 99-00

SY 00-01

READING
Below Basic 71% 47% 32% 37% 29%
Basic 18% 45% 55% 50% 58%
Proficient 11% 8% 12% 12% 12%
Advanced 0% 0% 1% 1% 1%
NCE Mean 30.8 34.4 40.1 39.1 41.8
MATHEMATICS
Below Basic 92% 53% 74% 73% 82%
Basic 9% 31% 22% 20% 17%
Proficient 0% 13% 4% 6% 1%
Advanced 0% 3% 0% 1% 0%
NCE Mean 27.4 47.6 38.5 40.2 37.7
OTHER DATA
Membership 253 346 342 287 240
Attendance Rate 92.4% 91.0% 87.2% 93.4% NA
Suspensions 60 18 0 3 NA

Back to top of page


Turner Elementary School

  • Academic performance for this school has been inconsistent over the five-year period especially in reading. There were, however, notable improvements during SY 2000-2001.
  • Ranked number 4 among all elementary schools on “Low Performance Index” for SY 1999-2000, which is based on SAT9 performance standards data.

Five-Year Performance Profile

Area

SY 96-97

SY 97-98

SY 98-99

SY 99-00

SY 00-01

READING
Below Basic 44% 50% 43% 41% 26%
Basic 44% 40% 44% 49% 52%
Proficient 11% 9% 11% 9% 19%
Advanced 1% 1% 2% 2% 3%
NCE Mean 35.4 33.5 37.0 37.2 43.7
MATHEMATICS
Below Basic 78% 54% 48% 50% 34%
Basic 18% 36% 38% 36% 45%
Proficient 4% 9% 12% 13% 18%
Advanced 0% 1% 2% 1% 3%
NCE Mean 31.9 33.8 37.1 36.7 45.7
OTHER DATA
Membership 661 662 579 517 506
Attendance Rate 94.3% 96.3% 95.0% 95.2% NA
Suspensions 4 38 23 15 NA

Back to top of page


Send mail with questions or comments to webmaster@dcwatch.com
Web site copyright ©DCWatch (ISSN 1546-4296)