Logosm.gif (1927 bytes)
navlinks.gif (4688 bytes)
Hruler04.gif (5511 bytes)

Back to Second Amendment and Gun Issues main page

Council Chairman Vincent Gray
Reaction to Heller Ruling
June 26, 2008




Dorothy Brizill
Bonnie Cain
Jim Dougherty
Gary Imhoff
Phil Mendelson
Mark David Richards
Sandra Seegars


DCWatch Archives
Council Period 12
Council Period 13
Council Period 14

Election 1998
Election 2000
Election 2002

Election 2004
Election 2006

Government and People
Anacostia Waterfront Corporation
Boards and Com
Campaign Finance
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Management Officer
City Council
Control Board
Corporation Counsel
DC Agenda
Elections and Ethics
Fire Department
FOI Officers
Inspector General
Housing and Community Dev.
Human Services
Mayor's Office
Mental Health
Motor Vehicles
Neighborhood Action
National Capital Revitalization Corp.
Planning and Econ. Dev.
Planning, Office of
Police Department
Property Management
Public Advocate
Public Libraries
Public Schools
Public Service Commission
Public Works
Regional Mobility Panel
Sports and Entertainment Com.
Taxi Commission
Telephone Directory
University of DC
Water and Sewer Administration
Youth Rehabilitation Services
Zoning Commission

Issues in DC Politics

Budget issues
DC Flag
DC General, PBC
Gun issues
Health issues
Housing initiatives
Mayor’s mansion
Public Benefit Corporation
Regional Mobility
Reservation 13
Tax Rev Comm
Term limits repeal
Voting rights, statehood
Williams’s Fundraising Scandals


Appleseed Center
Cardozo Shaw Neigh.Assoc.
Committee of 100
Fed of Citizens Assocs
League of Women Voters
Parents United
Shaw Coalition



What Is DCWatch?

themail archives


Council of the District of Columbia
Office of Chairman Vincent C. Gray
The John A. Wilson Building
1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20004

For Immediate Release: 
June 26 , 2008 
Contact: Doxie A. McCoy
202-724-8032 202-664-9862 Ė cell

Statement of Chairman Vincent C. Gray In Response to United States Supreme Court Decision in Heller v. District of Columbia

For more than 30 years, the District of Columbia has led the nation in adopting the most protective handgun restrictions allowed under the Constitution. These restrictions regulate the purchase, sale, possession, ownership, registration, transportation, importation, and manufacture of handguns. Do not expect that to change as the Council will continue to meet its obligation to protect the residents of the District of Columbia. Handguns and other dangerous weapons have been regulated in the District for more than 150 years, so I assure you that there will be some form of handgun regulation, and that regulation will be consistent with the Supreme Court decision.

We will use the Councilís recess to study the decision more carefully. This may include bringing in law enforcement professionals and scholars to assist us in crafting a comprehensive response to the courtís decision. We intend to preserve the most restrictive handgun regulation provisions that the Constitution permits and I will reserve the right to reconvene the Council to consider emergency action during our recess.

I have been advised that this decision has no immediate impact on our laws prohibiting the possession and use of guns outside of the home. There is no right to carry loaded handguns in the District. That has not changed. Nor will it. Under existing District law, only persons with valid gun registrations are even permitted to own ammunition.

The Supreme Courtís decision that the Second Amendment confers an individual right to bear arms only makes it possible for a particular District citizen to keep a handgun within his or her home. It does not prevent the District from placing restrictions on that right, and we intend to do just that. We will examine every option that is available. We already require the registration of rifles and shotguns, and we will require that handguns be registered. At minimum, we will enact legislation to apply registration requirements for handguns similar to those currently in place for rifles and shotguns. Components of the law may include registration requirements, minimum qualifications, criminal and mental background checks, medical clearance, training or test requirements, appropriate waiting periods, and procedures for transporting guns outside of the home. 

We likely will look to other urban areas with extensive handgun regulations, such as New York, Philadelphia, and San Francisco, in determining the best approach for the District. The impact of this decision by the Supreme Court will be felt not only in the District. It will affect laws in other jurisdictions, such as Chicago, which banned handgun possession in 1982. Our law in this area had been settled for 30 years, and had survived challenges in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, We have always believed that the Firearms Control Regulations Act imposed reasonable restrictions on handgun ownership designed to preserve the safety of our residents and deter crime. We will be making changes to our laws necessitated by this decision with those goals still foremost in our minds. 

Although I am disappointed by the courtís decision, working collectively with the Mayor, the Metropolitan Police, legal authorities, and residents, the Council will do all it can to prevent violence from escalating further as a result of todayís un-welcome weakening of our gun laws.

Back to top of page

Send mail with questions or comments to webmaster@dcwatch.com
Web site copyright ©DCWatch (ISSN 1546-4296)