Logosm.gif (1927 bytes)
navlinks.gif (4688 bytes)
Hruler04.gif (5511 bytes)

Back to DC Sports and Entertainment Commission main page

Councilmember Harold Brazil
Proposed issues to be considered by the 
Blue Ribbon Panel on the DC Sports and Entertainment Commission
July? 2003




Dorothy Brizill
Bonnie Cain
Jim Dougherty
Gary Imhoff
Phil Mendelson
Mark David Richards
Sandra Seegars


DCWatch Archives
Council Period 12
Council Period 13
Council Period 14

Election 1998
Election 2000
Election 2002

Election 2004
Election 2006

Government and People
Anacostia Waterfront Corporation
Boards and Com
Campaign Finance
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Management Officer
City Council
Control Board
Corporation Counsel
DC Agenda
Elections and Ethics
Fire Department
FOI Officers
Inspector General
Housing and Community Dev.
Human Services
Mayor's Office
Mental Health
Motor Vehicles
Neighborhood Action
National Capital Revitalization Corp.
Planning and Econ. Dev.
Planning, Office of
Police Department
Property Management
Public Advocate
Public Libraries
Public Schools
Public Service Commission
Public Works
Regional Mobility Panel
Sports and Entertainment Com.
Taxi Commission
Telephone Directory
University of DC
Water and Sewer Administration
Youth Rehabilitation Services
Zoning Commission

Issues in DC Politics

Budget issues
DC Flag
DC General, PBC
Gun issues
Health issues
Housing initiatives
Mayor’s mansion
Public Benefit Corporation
Regional Mobility
Reservation 13
Tax Rev Comm
Term limits repeal
Voting rights, statehood
Williams’s Fundraising Scandals


Appleseed Center
Cardozo Shaw Neigh.Assoc.
Committee of 100
Fed of Citizens Assocs
League of Women Voters
Parents United
Shaw Coalition



What Is DCWatch?

themail archives

Councilmember Harold Brazilís Proposed Issues to be Considered by the Blue Ribbon Panel on the DC Sports and Entertainment Commission

Topics for Discussion/Research

I. The two major functions of the Sports Commission are to: (1) Operate the Stadium-Armory Complex; and (2) Promote the District as a whole as a sports and entertainment location.

A. What types of entities handle these functions in other jurisdictions and how are they funded?

B. Does it make the most sense to have the same entity handle both functions? Should other functions also be handled by the same entity?

II. Facilities comparison

A. Do facilities similar to the Stadium and Armory (based on, e.g., age, condition, capacity, etc.) exist in the United States? What are their key characteristics?

B. What types of entities run these facilities, how are they funded, and are they profitable?

III. Is the operational function of the Commission self-supporting?

A. Can the Stadium be operated on a profitable, self-supporting basis?

B. Can the Armory be operated on a profitable, self-supporting basis? [The two venues should be considered separately.]

C. If the operations are not self-supporting, what type of monetary support would be needed to make them break-even? Would there need to be an annual appropriation of operating/capital funds? Would there only need to be a one-time infusion of funds?

IV. Funding of promotional function.

A. Are there/will there be sufficient profit from the operations of the Commissionís facilities to fund the Commissionís function of promoting the District as a whole as a sports and entertainment location?

B. What other sources of funding would be available for the promotional function? (See also section VI below.)

V. Multi-year operating/budget plans.

A. The Panel should receive and review the following:

1. At least one five-year plan developed by the Commission showing break-even operations without any outside funding (if possible). [If there is more than one reasonable break-even scenario, the other scenario(s) should be outlined, including the pros and cons of each scenario.]

2. The Commissionís preferred course, regardless of its breakĖeven status. For this course, the Commission should describe what actions would need to take place, what the costs would be, etc.

B. There are many variables that will affect the revenues and operations of the Commission. The Commission should develop, and the Panel should review, a flowchart showing how the Commission would handle different outcomes (e.g., baseball/no baseball; new soccer stadium/no new soccer stadium, grand prix/no grand prix), showing the Commissionís general financial situation under each scenario, and what actions the Commission would need to take in response to each.

VI. What are other sources of funding for the Commission?

A. Are there potential sources of funding from outside groups or the federal government?

B. What amount of funds could be obtained through a ticket surcharge or a surtax on concessions?

C. Can/should the Commission derive any income from promotional or organizational functions it may perform for events not held at the Stadium-Armory complex (e.g., DC Marathon, events it might help bring to convention center, etc.).

Back to top of page

Send mail with questions or comments to webmaster@dcwatch.com
Web site copyright ©DCWatch (ISSN 1546-4296)