Logosm.gif (1927 bytes)
navlinks.gif (4688 bytes)
Hruler04.gif (5511 bytes)

Back to Office of the Inspector General’s main pageBack to Mayor’s Office main page

Mayor Anthony A. Williams
Veto of the “Inspector General Qualifications Emergency Amendment Act of 2003”
April 2, 2003




Dorothy Brizill
Bonnie Cain
Jim Dougherty
Gary Imhoff
Phil Mendelson
Mark David Richards
Sandra Seegars


DCWatch Archives
Council Period 12
Council Period 13
Council Period 14

Election 1998
Election 2000
Election 2002

Election 2004
Election 2006

Government and People
Anacostia Waterfront Corporation
Boards and Com
Campaign Finance
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Management Officer
City Council
Control Board
Corporation Counsel
DC Agenda
Elections and Ethics
Fire Department
FOI Officers
Inspector General
Housing and Community Dev.
Human Services
Mayor's Office
Mental Health
Motor Vehicles
Neighborhood Action
National Capital Revitalization Corp.
Planning and Econ. Dev.
Planning, Office of
Police Department
Property Management
Public Advocate
Public Libraries
Public Schools
Public Service Commission
Public Works
Regional Mobility Panel
Sports and Entertainment Com.
Taxi Commission
Telephone Directory
University of DC
Water and Sewer Administration
Youth Rehabilitation Services
Zoning Commission

Issues in DC Politics

Budget issues
DC Flag
DC General, PBC
Gun issues
Health issues
Housing initiatives
Mayor’s mansion
Public Benefit Corporation
Regional Mobility
Reservation 13
Tax Rev Comm
Term limits repeal
Voting rights, statehood
Williams’s Fundraising Scandals


Appleseed Center
Cardozo Shaw Neigh.Assoc.
Committee of 100
Fed of Citizens Assocs
League of Women Voters
Parents United
Shaw Coalition



What Is DCWatch?

themail archives


April 2, 2003

The Honorable Linda W. Cropp
Council of the District of Columbia
The Wilson Building
1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 504
Washington, D.C. 20004

Dear Chairman Cropp:

Pursuant to section 404(3) of the District of Columbia Self-Govemment and Governmental Reorganization Act (Self-Government Act), D.C. Code § 1-204.04 (e) (2001), I am hereby vetoing Bill 15-200, the "Inspector General Qualifications Emergency Amendment Act of 2003." Although I am well aware of the Council's concerns with the incumbent Inspector General, I believe this legislation establishes an unacceptable precedent for addressing personnel matters, represents an intrusion into the separation of powers, and fast tracks a decision that should be treated judiciously.

A critical aspect of the operation of the Office of the Inspector General is its independence from political intrusions. Although ultimately accountable to all of us, the Inspector General must work in an environment where he or she can conduct thoughtful and thorough investigations into any matter within her or his jurisdiction without fear of interference, retaliation, and politic influence. This is why the statute establishing the Inspector General's Office provides for a fixed term and requires that the Inspector General may only be dismissed for cause by the Mayor.

The power to remove an executive official is an executive function - not a legislative function. See Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52(1926); see also Wilson v. Kelly, 615 A.2d 229 Q.C. 1992) (courts apply the same general separation of powers principles to the District government as are applied to the federal government). By imposing new qualification requirements on the incumbent that are impossible to meet by June 1, 2003, I believe the Council is violating firmly established separation of powers principles. See Ahearn v. Bailey, 451 P.2d 30 (Ariz. 1969)(legislature's power to abolish offices may not be used as a device to unseat the incumbent, thereby encroaching upon the authority of the executive); State ex rel. Hammond v. Maxfield, 132 P.2d 660 (Ut. 1943) (legislature may not indirectly circumvent the governor's power to remove); Kelley v. Clark, 193 A. 634 (Pa. 1937) (legislature cannot by direct or indirect means shift the power of removal). Using the legislative process to dismiss an incumbent from office undermines the rule of law instead of strengthening it.

Insofar as the Council's concerns about the overall job qualifications for an Inspector General, I continue to welcome the Council's input as we review and revise qualifications and expectations for District employees and agencies generally. However, the process of revising qualification standards should be undertaken in a judicious manner to ensure that future recruitment efforts result in consideration of the best-qualified candidates for the position. Imposing new requirements on an existing office holder would, in effect, allow the Council to dismiss any agency director that they had disagreements with, thereby undercutting the ability of any Mayor to manage the government

Anthony A. Williams

Back to top of page

Send mail with questions or comments to webmaster@dcwatch.com
Web site copyright ©DCWatch (ISSN 1546-4296)